On September the eleventh of September 2001, (9/11) nineteen al-Qaeda terrorists hi-jacked four airplanes from US airports. Two of the planes (flights 11 and 175) […]
Continue Reading 9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Listen people, here is the simple truth..>You ask why they would blow up our own buildings…
Because they were preparing for the collapse of the United States of America you sadly ignorant fools.
It is true, it was a planned event, but there is nothing you can or should do about it, because Karma will come around and they will all pay. You do not need to worry about that, because life is give and take.
Please just enjoy life and make the most of it, because the world as you know it is changing and those that are not prepared will not survive.
Believe me or not I lend you my pray and just ask you to watch :)
Here is the deal no matter what happens we have no part in it. Whether it is tis or whatever…but what is certain is that 9-11 was an inside job, and there is too much proof to surround this than most know of. For instance the first 3 steel frame buildings ever to collaps due to fire. WTC, and WTC 7. Also the wargames going on which hardly anyone knows about involving the government prepairing for a terrorist attack involving planes being used as guided missles.And the towers collapsed in a way that is not possible when involving free falling due to damage. The way these buldings pancaked was much like a detonation. Which reminds me. A majority of people in or around the buildings at the time heard numerous explotions prior to the towers collapses. Why did we wait 2 hours before sending planes to intercept? Why did we know that at least 3 of the 9-11 terrorists, also big roles in attack were terrorists, yet we did not question it. Why were 2 of those terrorists living using their full names in the same apartment, same room as an FBI agent? Why was none of this included in the full report. Why is there only one video for the Pentagon? Why are there no plane parts at the pentagon? Where are the plane parts for the Pennsylvania plane known as flight 93? And more so, why did the EPA tell people ground zero was safe for clean up, when actually it wasn’t and it caused many people to become ill and even death. Also, before we could evaluate the frames of the I dont know either the 47 built to take on a plane colunms of the towers Or the massive steel framework to china immediately after the collaps and melted them down? Isn’t that against FBI regulations because it is the destruction of of evidence. Did you know that aspestus was in the towers and it would have cost 1 billion dollars to fix. That is just one motive, there is so much more information out there for the public, and there is a clearer explination as well. I just wanted to make you all think and take into consideration that our government is screwing with us. Go to infowars.com or even just look up 9-11 inside job on any internet search engine. Discover the truth for yourself because the government will not give us the truth.
Why are 911truth groups making up alternative hoaxed information that has no physical evidence to back itself up. It is an effort to rewrite the events of 91101 into something that is not an act of terrorism.
Fact is 911truth groups use irrational building models with buildings that have no similarity to the world trade centers. Then insist that aircraft damage + fuel air explosion + secondary fires Cannot cause floors to collapse and structural damage to the WTC 1 and 2 towers.
The head of Security for AGI was warning of the vulnerabilities of the WTC 1 and 2 towers to an aircraft being used as a Bomb. t Let alone the fuel load of Jet b that burns closer to 2,000 degrees and damaged structural components.
Maybe if the people whom Run theses 911truth groups would read the full finalized FEMA, NIST 2008, and the USGS WTC dust report.
They would realize why the dust reacted and that was because it was caustic and thatwas because of the contents of the buildings.
The spectography from the air samples show that there is considerable risk and that is shows a dirty burn of Jet b
The Jones papers published through Bentham press were paid to be publishes to seems if they were peer reviewed when in fact anyone can pay $800.00 and get a paper into Bentham press
The samples do not have a chain of handling and are at the least 5 years old.
What did they find iron spheres from heated iron beams or office furniture or contents in the towers or other buildings impacted by the collapse.
They found that paint chips burn when you place them in an solution of solvent and then place them in acetylene torch.
They found none of their samples could be linked to either WTC 1 WTC 2 WTC 7 conclusively.
So this draws the conclusion that all the talk about termite or controlled demolition is bogus and unrealistic.
Considering a building 2,000 feet tall one acre square has never caught fire with multiple floors burning fuel by an initial high velocity aircraft hit from a heavy lift aircraft with at least 75% fuel load of Jet b.
Maybe this will help persuade you…
1) AWOL Chain of Command
a. It is well documented that the officials topping the chain of command for response to a domestic attack – George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers, Montague Winfield – all found reason to do something else during the actual attacks, other than assuming their duties as decision-makers.
b. Who was actually in charge? Dick Cheney, Richard Clarke, Norman Mineta and the 9/11 Commission directly conflict in their accounts of top-level response to the unfolding events, such that several (or all) of them must be lying.
2) Air Defense Failures
a. The US air defense system failed to follow standard procedures for responding to diverted passenger flights.
b. Timelines: The various responsible agencies – NORAD, FAA, Pentagon, USAF, as well as the 9/11 Commission – gave radically different explanations for the failure (in some cases upheld for years), such that several officials must have lied; but none were held accountable.
c. Was there an air defense standdown?
3) Pentagon Strike
How was it possible the Pentagon was hit 1 hour and 20 minutes after the attacks began? Why was there no response from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away and home to Air National Guard units charged with defending the skies above the nation”s capital? How did Hani Hanjour, a man who failed as a Cessna pilot on his first flight in a Boeing, execute a difficult aerobatic maneuver to strike the Pentagon? Why did the attack strike the just-renovated side, which was largely empty and opposite from the high command?
a. US military and other authorities planned or actually rehearsed defensive response to all elements of the 9/11 scenario during the year prior to the attack – including multiple hijackings, suicide crashbombings, and a strike on the Pentagon.
b. The multiple military wargames planned long in advance and held on the morning of September 11th included scenarios of a domestic air crisis, a plane crashing into a government building, and a large-scale emergency in New York. If this was only an incredible series of coincidences, why did the official investigations avoid the issue? There is evidence that the wargames created confusion as to whether the unfolding events were “real world or exercise.” Did wargames serve as the cover for air defense sabotage, and/or the execution of an “inside job”?
5) Flight 93
Did the Shanksville crash occur at 10:06 (according to a seismic report) or 10:03 (according to the 9/11 Commission)? Does the Commission wish to hide what happened in the last three minutes of the flight, and if so, why? Was Flight 93 shot down, as indicated by the scattering of debris over a trail of several miles?
THE DAY – POSSIBLE SMOKING GUNS
6) Did cell phones work at 30,000 feet in 2001? How many hijackings were attempted? How many flights were diverted?
7) Demolition Hypothesis
What caused the collapse of a third skyscraper, WTC 7, which was not hit by a plane? Were the Twin Towers and WTC 7 brought down by explosives? (See “The Case for Demolitions,” the websites wtc7.net and 911research.wtc7.net, and the influential article by physicist Steven Jones. See also items no. 16 and 24, below.)
FOREKNOWLEDGE & THE ALLEGED HIJACKERS
8) What did officials know? How did they know it?
a. Multiple allied foreign agencies informed the US government of a coming attack in detail, including the manner and likely targets of the attack, the name of the operation (the “Big Wedding”), and the names of certain men later identified as being among the perpetrators.
b. Various individuals came into possession of specific advance knowledge, and some of them tried to warn the US prior to September 11th.
c. Certain prominent persons received warnings not to fly on the week or on the day of September 11th.
9) Able Danger, Plus – Surveillance of Alleged Hijackers
a. The men identified as the 9/11 ringleaders were under surveillance for years beforehand, on the suspicion they were terrorists, by a variety of US and allied authorities – including the CIA, the US military”s “Able Danger” program, the German authorities, Israeli intelligence and others.
b. Two of the alleged ringleaders who were known to be under surveillance by the CIA also lived with an FBI asset in San Diego, but this is supposed to be yet another coincidence.
10) Obstruction of FBI Investigations prior to 9/11
A group of FBI officials in New York systematically suppressed field investigations of potential terrorists that might have uncovered the alleged hijackers – as the Moussaoui case once again showed. The stories of Sibel Edmonds, Robert Wright, Coleen Rowley and Harry Samit, the “Phoenix Memo,” David Schippers, the 199i orders restricting investigations, the Bush administration”s order to back off the Bin Ladin family, the reaction to the “Bojinka” plot, and John O”Neil do not, when considered in sum, indicate mere incompetence, but high-level corruption and protection of criminal networks, including the network of the alleged 9/11 conspirators. (Nearly all of these examples were omitted from or relegated to fleeting footnotes in The 9/11 Commission Report.)
11) Insider Trading
a. Unknown speculators allegedly used foreknowledge of the Sept. 11th events to profiteer on many markets internationally – including but not limited to “put options” placed to short-sell the two airlines, WTC tenants, and WTC re-insurance companies in Chicago and London.
b. In addition, suspicious monetary transactions worth hundreds of millions were conducted through offices at the Twin Towers during the actual attacks.
c. Initial reports on these trades were suppressed and forgotten, and only years later did the 9/11 Commission and SEC provide a partial, but untenable explanation for only a small number of transactions (covering only the airline put options through the Chicago Board of Exchange).
12) Who were the perpetrators?
a. Much of the evidence establishing who did the crime is dubious and miraculous: bags full of incriminating material that happened to miss the flight or were left in a van; the “magic passport” of an alleged hijacker, found at Ground Zero; documents found at motels where the alleged perpetrators had stayed days and weeks before 9/11.
b. The identities of the alleged hijackers remain unresolved, there are contradictions in official accounts of their actions and travels, and there is evidence several of them had “doubles,” all of which is omitted from official investigations.
c. What happened to initial claims by the government that 50 people involved in the attacks had been identified, including the 19 alleged hijackers, with 10 still at large (suggesting that 20 had been apprehended)? www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/sns-worldtrade-50suspects,0,1825231.story
THE 9/11 COVER-UP, 2001-2006
13) Who Is Osama Bin Ladin?
a. Who judges which of the many conflicting and dubious statements and videos attributed to Osama Bin Ladin are genuine, and which are fake? The most important Osama Bin Ladin video (Nov. 2001), in which he supposedly confesses to masterminding 9/11, appears to be a fake. In any event, the State Department”s translation of it is fraudulent.
b. Did Osama Bin Ladin visit Dubai and meet a CIA agent in July 2001 (Le Figaro)? Was he receiving dialysis in a Pakistani military hospital on the night of September 10, 2001 (CBS)?
c. Whether by Bush or Clinton: Why is Osama always allowed to escape?
d. The terror network associated with Osama, known as the “base” (al-Qaeda), originated in the CIA-sponsored 1980s anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan. When did this network stop serving as an asset to covert operations by US intelligence and allied agencies? What were its operatives doing in Kosovo, Bosnia and Chechnya in the years prior to 9/11?
14) All the Signs of a Systematic 9/11 Cover-up
a. Airplane black boxes were found at Ground Zero, according to two first responders and an unnamed NTSB official, but they were “disappeared” and their existence is denied in The 9/11 Commission Report.
b. US officials consistently suppressed and destroyed evidence (like the tapes recorded by air traffic controllers who handled the New York flights).
c. Whistleblowers (like Sibel Edmonds and Anthony Shaffer) were intimidated, gagged and sanctioned, sending a clear signal to others who might be thinking about speaking out.
d. Officials who “failed” (like Myers and Eberhard, as well as Frasca, Maltbie and Bowman of the FBI) were given promotions.
15) Poisoning New York
The White House deliberately pressured the EPA into giving false public assurances that the toxic air at Ground Zero was safe to breathe. This knowingly contributed to an as-yet unknown number of health cases and fatalities, and demonstrates that the administration does consider the lives of American citizens to be expendable on behalf of certain interests.
16) Disposing of the Crime Scene
The rapid and illegal scrapping of the WTC ruins at Ground Zero disposed of almost all of the structural steel indispensable to any investigation of the collapse mechanics. (See also item no. 23, below.)
Mailings of weapons-grade anthrax – which caused a practical suspension of the 9/11 investigations – were traced back to US military stock. Soon after the attacks began in October 2001, the FBI approved the destruction of the original samples of the Ames strain, disposing of perhaps the most important evidence in identifying the source of the pathogens used in the mailings. Were the anthrax attacks timed to coincide with the Afghanistan invasion? Why were the letters sent only to media figures and to the leaders of the opposition in the Senate (who had just raised objections to the USA PATRIOT Act)?
18) The Stonewall
a. Colin Powell promised a “white paper” from the State Department to establish the authorship of the attacks by al-Qaeda. This was never forthcoming, and was instead replaced by a paper from Tony Blair, which presented only circumstantial evidence, with very few points actually relating to September 11th.
b. Bush and Cheney pressured the (freshly-anthraxed) leadership of the Congressional opposition into delaying the 9/11 investigation for months. The administration fought against the creation of an independent investigation for more than a year.
c. The White House thereupon attempted to appoint Henry Kissinger as the chief investigator, and acted to underfund and obstruct the 9/11 Commission.
19) A Record of Official Lies
a. “No one could have imagined planes into buildings” – a transparent falsehood upheld repeatedly by Rice, Rumsfeld and Bush.
b. “Iraq was connected to 9/11” – The most “outrageous conspiracy theory” of all, with the most disastrous impact.
20) Pakistani Connection – Congressional Connection
a. The Pakistani intelligence agency ISI, creator of the Taliban and close ally to both the CIA and “al-Qaeda,” allegedly wired $100,000 to Mohamed Atta just prior to September 11th, reportedly through the ISI asset Omar Saeed Sheikh (later arrested for the killing of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, who was investigating ISI connections to “al-Qaeda.”)
b. This was ignored by the congressional 9/11 investigation, although the senator and congressman who ran the probe (Bob Graham and Porter Goss) were meeting with the ISI chief, Mahmud Ahmed, on Capitol Hill on the morning of September 11th.
c. About 25 percent of the report of the Congressional Joint Inquiry was redacted, including long passages regarding how the attack (or the network allegedly behind it) was financed. Graham later said foreign allies were involved in financing the alleged terror network, but that this would only come out in 30 years.
21) Unanswered Questions and the “Final Fraud” of the 9/11 Commission:
a. The September 11th families who fought for and gained an independent investigation (the 9/11 Commission) posed 400-plus questions, which the 9/11 Commission adopted as its roadmap. The vast majority of these questions were completely ignored in the Commission hearings and the final report.
b. The membership and staff of the 9/11 Commission displayed awesome conflicts of interest. The families called for the resignation of Executive Director Philip Zelikow, a Bush administration member and close associate of “star witness” Condoleezza Rice, and were snubbed. Commission member Max Cleland resigned, condemning the entire exercise as a “scam” and “whitewash.”
c.The 9/11 Commission Report is notable mainly for its obvious omissions, distortions and outright falsehoods – ignoring anything incompatible with the official story, banishing the issues to footnotes, and even dismissing the still-unresolved question of who financed 9/11 as being “of little practical significance.”
22) Crown Witnesses Held at Undisclosed Locations
The alleged masterminds of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohamed (KSM) and Ramzi Binalshibh, are reported to have been captured in 2002 and 2003, although one Pakistani newspaper said KSM was killed in an attempted capture. They have been held at undisclosed locations and their supposed testimonies, as provided in transcript form by the government, form much of the basis for The 9/11 Commission Report (although the Commission”s request to see them in person was denied). After holding them for years, why doesn”t the government produce these men and put them to trial?
23) Spitzer Redux
a. Eliot Spitzer, attorney general of New York State, snubbed pleas by New York citizens to open 9/11 as a criminal case (Justicefor911.org).
b. Spitzer also refused to allow his employee, former 9/11 Commission staff member Dietrich Snell, to testify to the Congress about his (Snell”s) role in keeping “Able Danger” entirely out of The 9/11 Commission Report.
24) NIST Omissions
After the destruction of the WTC structural steel, the official Twin Towers collapse investigation was left with almost no forensic evidence, and thus could only provide dubious computer models of ultimately unprovable hypotheses. It failed to even test for the possibility of explosives. (Why not clear this up?)
25) Radio Silence
The 9/11 Commission and NIST both allowed the continuing cover-up of how Motorola”s faulty radios, purchased by the Giuliani administration, caused firefighter deaths at the WTC – once again showing the expendability, even of the first responders.
26) The Legal Catch-22
a. Hush Money – Accepting victims” compensation barred September 11th families from pursuing discovery through litigation.
b. Judge Hallerstein – Those who refused compensation to pursue litigation and discovery had their cases consolidated under the same judge (and as a rule dismissed).
27) Saudi Connections
a. The 9/11 investigations made light of the “Bin Ladin Airlift” during the no-fly period, and ignored the long-standing Bush family business ties to the Bin Ladin family fortune. (A company in which both families held interests, the Carlyle Group, was holding its annual meeting on September 11th, with George Bush Sr., James Baker, and two brothers of Osama Bin Ladin in attendance.)
b. The issue of Ptech.
28) Media Blackout of Prominent Doubters
The official story has been questioned and many of the above points were raised by members of the US Congress, retired high-ranking officers of the US military, the three leading third-party candidates for President in the 2004 election, a member of the 9/11 Commission who resigned in protest, a former high-ranking adviser to the George W. Bush administration, former ministers to the German, British and Canadian governments, the commander-in-chief of the Russian air force, 100 luminaries who signed the “9/11 Truth Statement,” and the presidents of Iran and Venezuela. Not all of these people agree fully with each other, but all would normally be considered newsworthy. Why has the corporate-owned US mass media remained silent about these statements, granting due coverage only to the comments of actor Charlie Sheen?
GEOPOLITICS, TIMING AND POSSIBLE MOTIVES
29) “The Great Game”
The Afghanistan invasion was ready for Bush”s go-ahead on September 9, 2001, with US and UK force deployments to the region already in place or underway. This followed the failure earlier that year of backdoor diplomacy with the Taliban (including payments of $125 million in US government aid to Afghanistan), in an attempt to secure a unity government for that country as a prerequisite to a Central Asian pipeline deal.
30) The Need for a “New Pearl Harbor”
Principals in US foreign policy under the current Bush administration (including Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Perle and others) have been instrumental in developing long-running plans for worldwide military hegemony, including an invasion of the Middle East, dating back to the Ford, Reagan and Bush Sr. administrations. They reiterated these plans in the late 1990s as members of the “Project for a New American Century,” and stated a clear intent to invade Iraq for the purpose of “regime change.” After 9/11, they lost no time in their attempt to tie Iraq to the attacks.
31) Perpetual “War on Terror”
9/11 is supposed to provide carte-blanche for an open-ended, global and perpetual “War on Terror,” against any enemy, foreign or domestic, that the executive branch chooses to designate, and regardless of whether evidence exists to actually connect these enemies to 9/11.
32) Attacking the Constitution
a. The USA PATRIOT Act was written before 9/11, Homeland Security and the “Shadow Government” were developed long before 9/11, and plans for rounding up dissidents as a means for suppressing civil disturbance have been in the works for decades.
b. 9/11 was used as the pretext to create a new, extra-constitutional executive authority to declare anyone an “enemy combatant” (including American citizens), to detain persons indefinitely without habeas corpus, and to “render” such persons to secret prisons where torture is practiced.
33) Legal Trillions
9/11 triggers a predictable shift of public spending to war, and boosts public and private spending in the “new” New Economy of “Homeland Security,” biometrics, universal surveillance, prisons, civil defense, secured enclaves, security, etc.
34) Plundered Trillions?
On September 10, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld announced a “war on waste” after an internal audit found that the Pentagon was “missing” 2.3 trillion dollars in unaccounted assets. On September 11th, this was as good as forgotten.
35) Did 9/11 prevent a stock market crash?
Did anyone benefit from the destruction of the Securities and Exchange Commission offices at WTC 7, and the resultant crippling of hundreds of fraud investigations?
36) Resource Wars
a. What was discussed in the Energy Task Force meetings under Dick Cheney in 2001? Why is the documentation of these meetings still being suppressed?
b. Is Peak Oil a motive for 9/11 as inside job?
37) The “Little Game”
Why was the WTC privatized just before its destruction?
The longstanding relationship between US intelligence networks and radical Islamists, including the network surrounding Osama Bin Ladin. (See also point 13d.)
39) Historical Precedents for “Synthetic Terror”
a. In the past many states, including the US government, have sponsored attacks on their own people, fabricated the “cause for war,” created (and armed) their own enemies of convenience, and sacrificed their own citizens for “reasons of state.”
b. Was 9/11 an update of the Pentagon-approved “Project Northwoods” plan for conducting self-inflicted, false-flag terror attacks in the United States, and blaming them on a foreign enemy?
40) Secret Government
a. The record of criminality and sponsorship of coups around the world by the covert networks based within the US intelligence complex.
b. Specifically also: The evidence of crime by Bush administration principals and their associates, from October Surprise to Iran-Contra and the S&L plunder to PNAC, Enron/Halliburton and beyond.
REASON NUMBER 41:
RELATED MOVEMENTS AND PARALLEL ISSUES
Ground Zero aftermath movements:
– Justice for the air-poisoning cover-up (wtceo.org)
– “Radio Silence” (radiosilencefdny.com)
– Skyscraper Safety (www.skyscrapersafety.org).
Pseudoscience and unconfirmed rumors don’t create facts.
the reason they are called theories, is because none of the evidence supports them, 911myths.com, jod911.com, start there people.
I believe that the twin tower explosion on 9/11, was without a doubt, a controlled explosion. Knowing the United States and their controlled security system makes leaves their version of “the truth” out of the picture. It was proven, that the twin towers collapsed at free fall, meaning that if they would have really collapsed due to the plane crash, the floors would have collapsed in a different manner, floor by floor, by floor. In some videos I have seen throughout the years, there are bomb-like explosions that can be appreciated on the buildings as the buildings were falling. Many professionals and experts have stated that the building, specifically the metals that were used, to last any fire, and that it would take hours and hours for the heat of the fire to melt it. How is it possible that the building collapsed in such a short period of time if the fire had not reached the bottom, or even the center of the buildings? And both buldings? One right after another? There is also evidence of activity in the building before the attack. Some witnesses stated to have seen dogs, people they have never seen before, performing “security annual check up’s” that had never been done in the past. The main security director of the building was nonetheless, George W. Bush’s brother, Marvin P. Bush. What a coincidence don’t you think? There was also a big, and I mean big quantity of money that investors would have received if they premisses were ever affected, specifically by a terrorism attack. And we are talking about millions, and millions of dollars. As far as the Pentagon, it was stated by military officials that a plane had crashed into the building but there was never any real physical evidence collected that a plane had crashed into the building. Wouldn’t you agree that if a plane crashed, you would be able to see the motor of this so called plane that is said to weigh over 1 ton each? Only the building was affected, nothing around was. It seemed like there was a bomb that had exploded in a specific part of the pentagon. There was no sign of the wings, no motor, and no damage to the outside of the building? For example, the grass, the outside lights, and the pavement were absolutely intact. Wouldn’t you agree, once again, that if a plane, at the speed it was coming, would have caused some type of damage to the buildings surroundings? This was without a doubt, one of the worse thought out plan in the history of the U.S. Seems to me that President Bush didn’t think that The People would actually do their own investigating. It’s time for people to wake up and start thinking about the future of this country. Next thing you know, it will become a totalitarian country. We don’t think of it because it hasn’t happened. But once it does, we will suffer the consequences. The government does not care about us. Its only interest is power, leaving us out the picture. And they will not stop.
The following is an extract from the attachment, an article from Site http://jesusdzeus.com
This is the result of investigation by someone who has access to the ‘Mental Internet’, where all facts are recocrded. (You may have not even heard about the Mental Internet or the ‘Living Records’).
1. Onasis paid for the assassination of John F. Kennedy. The original payment of $10 million was made to high-ranking CIA man James Harper who took care of the rest.
2. The rest of the story, with the attack on the WTC, involved Hermes. He selected his group among very dedicated young Islamists, who were already looking for a cause to champion. Such a determined group devoted to a cause, as the ‘Hamburg cell’, would be easily welcome by Al Queda. But Al Queda was not the only organization that helped them. Hermes made sure that they received all the help they needed and their way to their mission was made easy in every way possible by his Freemasons and their ‘Committee of the Majority’, through which Hermes controls all power centers in the Western World, including the CIA. The ‘Committee’ knew about the terrorists’ plans and helped invisibly, (even in the selection of the targets), but the latter suspected nothing.
However, their mission could not have been so spectacularly effective without the hands on contribution of the demolition squads employed by the ‘Committee’. It is impossible that airplanes crashing very high up into the buildings and to one side would cause their perfectly vertical collapse all the way to their footprint. The collapse of the buildings was a preset controlled demolition and it was planned in conjunction with the terrorist attacks. The ‘Committee’ did not believe that the terrorists could be such good pilots as to hit the towers accurately but would hit the general WTC area. In expectation of the terrorist attack, all WTC buildings were prepared for demolition, to be set off after allowing some time for evacuation. [The Insurance cover for a possible terrorist attack was many billion dollars and was promptly collected. WTC7 was demolished in the afternoon and the rest of the WTC buildings later, the latter as being ‘damaged beyond repair’! (They were so, because of their preparation for demolition and not because of the planes crash). They were all privately owned by high-ranking Freemasons. The ‘Committee’ did not approve the Whitehouse, the Capitol or the Pentagon as targets as these were not privately owned to collect Insurance but could not dictate its choice.]
As for the Anthrax scare, this had nothing to do with Islamic terrorists. This was the work of a high-ranking ex-freemason and ex-CIA agent by the name Weston, who left freemasonry because he thought that his rank in freemasonry should be higher than it was. After he left freemasonry and the CIA, he was no longer involved with the laboratories that experimented with the Anthrax spores but kept a close touch with old associates still working there. They are the ones who provided him with the spores. He and some of his associates had a bone to pick with the American establishment and the September 11th events gave them the opportunity to start the scare.
Jesus D Zeus
its easy to get caught up in these theories, but heres the deal people….with all thats knows or that i HOPE you know) from the government, at least to me, you can only conclude that our government is not near competent enough to execute such a massive coverup. somehow, somewhere some day , someone would talk, there would be a smoking gun , period, think of all the other government messes that the gov hasnt been able to get away with, the Tillman attempted coverup, the Lewinsky Clinton scandal, are just two. But just think, if the gov was anywhere as powerful and spooky as some movies sometimes would make it seem it is, no problems at all would see the light of day.
for this to have been a coverup wouldve involved a massive undertaking of just not the “brains” behind it , but the people executing it and their families. take for example, the supposed demolition. ok so just for the sake of argument lets say that the owner of the demolition company is heartless enough to participate in such a mass killing…but how about the people actually setting this up… this wouldve taken several dozen people at the least to prepare. i dont mean to sound naive, i know there are lot of evil bastards in the world, i just dont believe there were no evil bastards well enough organized to scheme and then achieve this plot.
the lone gunmen knew the lone gunmen knew
within 30 minutes of the first plane hitting a building in new york on september 11th 2001, the media had informed us osama bin laden and his henchmen were probably responsible. as soon as the towers fell the media told us it was the fires weakening the steal that caused collapse. this message was repeated and repeated and any other views were rediculed and those questioning the ‘official’ version of events were called ‘conspiracy theorists’. that process continues to this day.
if i reported to the police that i knew a great deal about a serious crime that had just happened, that i knew who did it, who funded it and where they were hiding, would the police just say ‘thanks for that, we had better believe you and tell everyone else thats what happened’? ……..why is the police scenario so clearly rediculous when so many people cant question or wilfully refuse to even consider the official 9/11 story as just as rediculous?
It was already known in 1990 there was a possibility of an plane bombing and at at point of time Albright’s inaction/actions caused non action and the resignation of the FBI chief because he could not do his job with an incompetent administration whom cannot admit to a clear and present threat to national security. Because of NSC-68 protocalls in place since FDR
Building 7 (falling at free-fall speed, nothing hit it) and the firefighters near the towers that day (hearing explosions) are the smoking gun.
Brad it was hit by WTC tower and so was wtc 6 as well. Building 7 fell in the direction of the damage from wtc towr hitting it. Try looking at photos that were on 91201 it shows wtc7 laid across the road. 911truthers show photos without time dates for a reason to disinformation the public and create a false reality that will cover up the real reality of what happened.