Why are 911truth groups making up alternative hoaxed information that has no physical evidence to back itself up. It is an effort to rewrite the events of 91101 into something that is not an act of terrorism.
Fact is 911truth groups use irrational building models with buildings that have no similarity to the world trade centers. Then insist that aircraft damage + fuel air explosion + secondary fires Cannot cause floors to collapse and structural damage to the WTC 1 and 2 towers.
The head of Security for AGI was warning of the vulnerabilities of the WTC 1 and 2 towers to an aircraft being used as a Bomb. t Let alone the fuel load of Jet b that burns closer to 2,000 degrees and damaged structural components.
Maybe if the people whom Run theses 911truth groups would read the full finalized FEMA, NIST 2008, and the USGS WTC dust report.
They would realize why the dust reacted and that was because it was caustic and thatwas because of the contents of the buildings.
The spectography from the air samples show that there is considerable risk and that is shows a dirty burn of Jet b
The Jones papers published through Bentham press were paid to be publishes to seems if they were peer reviewed when in fact anyone can pay $800.00 and get a paper into Bentham press
The samples do not have a chain of handling and are at the least 5 years old.
What did they find iron spheres from heated iron beams or office furniture or contents in the towers or other buildings impacted by the collapse.
They found that paint chips burn when you place them in an solution of solvent and then place them in acetylene torch.
They found none of their samples could be linked to either WTC 1 WTC 2 WTC 7 conclusively.
So this draws the conclusion that all the talk about termite or controlled demolition is bogus and unrealistic.
Considering a building 2,000 feet tall one acre square has never caught fire with multiple floors burning fuel by an initial high velocity aircraft hit from a heavy lift aircraft with at least 75% fuel load of Jet b.
More Comments by Daniel
The 911truth.org and synicated sites are all scams they are not scientific and areacedemic frauds. Most participants are wofully undereducated about the physical layout of WTC1 and wtc 2 structually or te underground leves that conneccted the two towers …
the911truth hoax for money conspriacy theroy
Let’s taddress the social enterpeneurship of the 91101 fictional conmspriracy theroies that are made by thoes whom are attempting to profiterr off of the terro ist attacks. Tere are no mysteries as the planes that hit …
Mor misleading logical fallicies
If Osama Bin Laden bombed the World Trade Centre in 1993, then why would he come back 8 years later to destroy it?
Gee he sent other crusaders via proxy to carry out the attacks and the cell group that …
mor proof that the con game is the no moon landing hoax
Http://www.clavius.org/
go there to educate your self about the no moon landing hoax. Yes the conspiracy theory of no moon landing is a fabrication of media and social entrepreneurship targeting undereducated and gullible people to buy into their media driven hoax …
point by point debunking of hoaxed no landing theroies
Http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
you might want to rain in the faulty research with real science …
More Comments on 9/11 Conspiracy Theory by Daniel
9/11 Conspiracy Theory
The 911truth.org and synicated sites are all scams they are not scientific and areacedemic frauds. Most participants are wofully undereducated about the physical layout of WTC1 and wtc 2 structually or te underground leves that conneccted the two towers …
Mor misleading logical fallicies
If Osama Bin Laden bombed the World Trade Centre in 1993, then why would he come back 8 years later to destroy it?
Gee he sent other crusaders via proxy to carry out the attacks and the cell group that …
9/11 Conspiracy Theory
So you ever even visit the WTC complex in New York my guess is no. The fact that you would peddle such political rhetoric and base it on fiction is beyond any laughable scenario. Obviously you were in …
9/11 Conspiracy Theory
However, the question and answer involved was a discussion of how (a) Bush is a dictator, (b) the U.S. government has collapsed and no longer exists and a shadow conspiracy is running the country, (c) a questioner then asked if …
9/11 Conspiracy Theory
Brad it was hit by WTC tower and so was wtc 6 as well. Building 7 fell in the direction of the damage from wtc towr hitting it. Try looking at photos that were on 91201 it shows wtc7 …