The thing is… all you “conspiracy theorists” are bringing up some very interesting observations, which I have heard before but are nonetheless convincing. I too thought that this plot was nothing more than a silly hoax at first, but really, the more I learn about the event itself, the more footage of the collapse I see and the emergence of simply astounding and random occurrences, like the collapse of WTC7 and the absence of jet wreckage at the Pentagon, the fact that they just “happened to be” performing air force exercises involving building attacks on that day.
It’s simply too much.
It’s not damning proof, but it is just too much damn EVIDENCE. If it were a court case, the defense would be helpless.
On the other hand, I would be willing to open my ears to opposing information. I hear what you’re saying about NORAD, but it simply does not compute. You cannot expect me to believe that our national defense system is set up in such a way as to detect only INCOMING attacks. What then happens to invading aircraft once they enter our airspace? When they travel inland, do we immediately lose them on our radar tracking systems? Perhaps you are right, and our air defense is as assbackwards as all that, but if that is the only thing you are right about, then you have a lot of refuting still left to do.
Oh, and BTW, comments like “your all brainwashed” references to cultishness etc. etc. only convince me further that 9/11 was an “inside job” because it demonstrates a lack of counter-evidence by the opposition.
Seriously… I don’t want to believe that it actually went down this way, but none of you naysayers are very convincing.