On all of the Apollo cameras used to take pictures of the moon landing there is a + in the middle of the lens to […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Camera Problems
WELL AGAIN, ON A PURELY PRACTICAL LEVEL, WHAT DID WE GAIN FROM THE ‘MOON LANDINGS?’, A FEW NEW MATERIALS, AND WHAT ELSE? IF WE HAD SPENT NASA’S TRILLIONS ON ADVANCING THE HUMAN RACE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN WORTH IT, PUT IT THIS WAY, IN 1969 WE SEND 6 MISSIONS TO THE MOON, ONLY 13, A STAGED EVENT TO GET MORE MONEY IS STAGED, PUBLIC INTEREST IS WANING, AND YET, SINCE THEN, UP TO 2012 WE HAVE NEVER GONE HIGHER THAN 400, YES 400 MILES AND LOST 14 ASTRONAUTS, BEFORE THAT WE WENT 230,000 MILES, SURELY THAT IS PROGRESS IN REVERSE, IF THE YANKS HAD REALLY GONE TO THE MOON IN ’69 DON’T YOU THINK US MERE PEASANTS WOULD NOW BE ENJOYING SPACE TRAVEL, ALBEIT AT A PRICE? YET ALL WE WAIT FOR IS PRIVATEER RICHARD BRANSON, COMPLETE AND UTTER BULLSHIT.
Take a look at this photo ( 0618MR0026010620401331E01_DXXX.jpg ) of Mars and look an the second large stone up from bottom right corner going diagonally left. There is a letter ‘C’ EXACTLY similar to the one on the famous “Moon prop rock” shown above. Not a hair now eh? Explain that big boys.
It’s not a C, it’s an O.
And it *looks* like some kind of inclusion (a pebble embedded in a slightly softer matrix rock). It looks like the surrounding matrix has eroded a bit, leaving a small channel around the edge of the pebble.
Or it could be something completely different; n ot a geologist.
So are we saying that the Mars probes are all hoaxes too, now?
I am convinced hoax theorists are liberal just based on the stupid non common sense comments I am reading