Another problem with the moon landing photos can be seen in the next two Apollo images below. Several astronauts seem to be lit up, as […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof
I am really surprised at why nobody have ever understood the Russian silence on this subject, it is quite easy to understand when you think of it. Just remember the cold war, OK. each side were trying to beat the other side, OK. Many claims of achievement were made by each side and many times they were just bluff. When claims of achievement were genuine each side were proud to announce them just to convince the other side that they had the edge,OK. Try this experiment, draw a square, now divide it into four squares with a vertical and a horizontal. Mark the top left hand square as 1, the bottom left hand as 2, the top right hand as 3 and the bottom right hand as 4. In square 1, write, The Americans landed on the moon. In the bottom left, 2 The Americans never landed on the moon. In the top right marked 3 write, the Russians Had the ability to track. in the bottom right square marked 4 write, The Russians never had the ability to track. Now, if you link up 1, the Americans went to the moon , with number 3, the Russians had the ability to track. Dont you think that despite loosing the race to the moon the Russians would have been proud to say, yes you went there because we tracked you all the way. This would have been a feather in the Russians cap by proving to the Americans that they had the technology to track. They didnt say anything did they. Now link up no 1 top left left with no 4 bottom right. The Americans landed and the Russians never had the ability to track, What would be going through the Russians mind? Stating that they can not say because they do not have the ability would be giving away secrets, ie letting the Americans know that they are not as advanced as the claim. Their next line of thought would be, what if we congratulated the Americans by stating we tracked them and it turned out they never landed. That would be letting the Americans know their level of tracking. The only thing that makes any sense is the Russians never had the ability to track and their best option was to button their lip and say nothing. Not giving anything away.
The squire technique is great man! I thik that’s how they train the chimps. So in the end of the day you suggested that the Russia (soviet union back then) had no abillity to track at least the radio communications? So USA didn’t have the abillity to send a man the Moon and the Russia had sirous into the radio waves study and commucication technologies.
So draw a triangle. Divided it at thre. Draw a circle in the middle. Then surround this whole thing with a rectangle. And there you go – these drawings summarize all of your (Moon conspirators) knowledge and capabilities :)
OKAY, THERE WAS A TIME, NOT SO LONG AGO IN FACT THAT I WOULD’VE ENJOYED THIS KIND OF DEBATE~ BUT THIS BICKERING AND ARGUING BACK AND FORTH AMONGST EACHOTHER SEEMS TO BE QUITE HONEST, A BIT POINTLESS AND IRRELAVENT (IF I SPELLED THAT WRONG MY BAD) FOR THE TIME BEING…I AM SPEAKING OF THE CRISIS IN HAITI, AND ALL OVER THIS WORLD (OUR WORLD ) AS WE SPEAK. NEVER LESS OUR OWN COUNTRY’S CRISIS…THE HUNGRY, HOMELESS, DISSABLED VETS, THE ABUSED…MUST I GO ON? DON’T GET ME WRONG…SPACE EXPLORATION IS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN A BIG THING IN MY LIFE, AND IN MY HUSBAND’S, AND IN MY FATHER’S LIFE(S) AS WELL~ BUT WHAT I WANT TO KNOW, AND IF U HAVE THE ANSWERS PLEASE DO GIVE THEM TO ME, AND PROVE ME WRONG! WHAT I WANT TO KNOW, IS WHAT IS NASA DOING/ OR THINKING, RATHER BY SPLURGING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS ON TODAY’S SHUTTLE MISSION (AS WE SPEAK) WHILE ON THE OTHER END OF THE GLOBE THERE ARE STILL HELPLESS VICTIMS LAYING IN MAKESHIFT HOSPITAL BEDS AMIST RUBLE AND ENDLESS DEBRIS? COULDN’T THIS MISSION HAVE WAITED A BIT LONGER? HAVE THEY (NASA) EVEN DONATED ANYTHING TO THE CAUSE? TO ANY OF OUR OWN NATIONS CAUSES? AGAIN, IF I AM WRONG…PLEASE LET ME KNOW? BUT IF WHAT I HAVE SAID IN THIS BLOG HAS HIT A CORD W/ ANYONE, AND YOU ‘FEEL’ ME? PLEASE…BE MY GUEST AND SPEAK OUT.
like it or not…the truth hurts huh/
No No and No. Mine your own business. It’s not your job to fix the other people’s lives – try fix your own instead. Stop messing with the rest of the world. They don’t need your donation. They don’t need your churches which latter on will try to take away your donations plus everything else they earn on top. Stop messing in the other people’s business. If they want to fight – let them fight. If they want a peace – don’t send your army there. Is simple as that.
i think it was also fake becuse when he landed and he put the flag down it was moving but there is no wind in space and plus the shadows were not parrel and the only way this can happen if there was more then 1 light sorce ;) pleas comeent after thank yooh
Watch the video again. The flag only moves when the astronauts are near it, either touching the flag or the pole. The flag is supported by a horizontal rod a the top of the pole (like a curtain rod). When they push the pole into the ground or the sections together they rotate it which causes the flag to wave. As for the shadows not being parallel, this is what happens due to perspective (okay I’m getting technical). Example take a picture a square object from an angle. Do the sides across from each other look parallel? There is also the railroad track effect. Take a picture of railroad tracks while standing between them (When no train is coming of course)with the camera aimed to the horizon. The resulting photo will show the parallel rails converging as they near the horizon. Proof that parallel lines do not necessarily appear parallel on photos. If there was more than one light source than each object (flag pole or rock etc.) would have more than one shadow. This never happens in any apollo photo because the only light source is the sun.
…then the Holocaust never happened…you people are ignorant. We went to the moon, we aren’t going again (at least not anytime soon), and no one on any site that I have looked at have given any substantial evidence that this was faked and yet everyone that supports that the landing was real has been able to give a credible answer for every question asked.
EllE Ford, hum… whats your real name?
Myth busters moon landing hoax episode. Yawn.
Think inertia and zero air resistance.
But don’t take my word for it.
A small child in elementary school could explain it to you.
It really is just a matter of opinion, no one side could ever really prove that the moon landings did/didn’t happen.
But, it’s one of the very few genuinely amazing events that possibly (and in my eyes did) happen. Why have such a cynical view?
To those who dont believe the moon landings occured, i ask: Why did they proceed with another 6 missions after apollo 11? Why not stop after 1, the point was proved, no? NASA consisted of some of the smartest people in the world, don’t you think they would have really thoroughly scrutinized their images etc. if it was all fake? Why wouldn’t anyone who knew it was fake now admit it? How come all the astronauts’ lives have been changed so dramatically sinse (surely they didn’t just randomly become alcoholics/recluses etc..)? If we are going to make up moon landings, why stop there? If it was hoaxed, NASA have risked a hell of a lot, I mean, if it was found out to be a hoax, the whole world would be in uproar, would they really risk that?
I think the basis on which people claim it was all a hoax is pretty damn poor. Nevertheless, I suppose we all have opinions. I don’t think anyone should get too worked up on it however, I mean, like I said, no one can PROVE that it was all a hoax – its a matter of opinion :)
“It really is just a matter of opinion, no one side could ever really prove that the moon landings did/didn’t happen.”
Of course it can be proven. You can send a probe back to the Moon to look for the landing sites (which we’ve done already; the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter imaged some of the Apollo landing sites to high enough resolution to make out the tracks the astronauts left in the dust). A company named Astrobotic is working to build an unmanned lunar rover to explore the Apollo 11 landing site.
There’s nothing stopping anyone (other than $$$$$$$$$$) from building their own lunar mission (either an orbiter with a high-resolution camera to scan the surface or a lander/rover to explore the surface) and contract with a private company like SpaceX or ULA or Arianespace to launch it.
But even that *shouldn’t* be necessary; there’s the physical evidence (samples), documentary evidence (photographs, film, video, telemetry), and eyewitness evidence (the astronauts themselves, all the people who witnessed the launches, etc.) from the missions themselves.
That should be than enough proof for any reasonable person.
Don’t let those pesky little facts sway your opinion.
yeah right, it was costly to print the photos !! what kind of dumb excuse is that ?? NASA can spend millions of dollors to send first human being to the moon but when he came back from there they suddenly find out that they were completely broke. and can not print extra set of photos, because that cost another million i guess. crap !!!!!!!
NASA does land on the moon, but not when they claimed it.
Are you related to Sarah Palin?
wow so you all are space experts now? why dont you have a job for nasa if you are an expert on it? get a life
I hear NASA is looking for a few good janitors.
Maybe we went to the moon, but I doubt it. I’ve seen plenty of pictures of various lunar landers from various missions, but I have yet to see an impression on the moon’s surface that indicates that a powerful rocket was blasting hard against it, so that a very gentle touchdown could occur. Remember, even if the moon’s gravity is slight, the lander MUST land without error, or our guys will never make it home. So it touched down slowly, carefully, with that rocket flame pushing that powdery lunar dirt away from the hole it should have dug just beneath the lander. So where’s the hole? How about any disturbance whatsoever. Fake, fake fake!
I agree thats the only thing I have a problem with, and If you ever saw the lunar module test not one could be properly controlled, and even at 1/6th earths gravity, It would have mad a crater coming and going. I’m not a space expert but the laws of physics are the same in outer space as on earth (with adjustments) were’s the dust on the module??
I think about the only thing that would make an impression on you is a hammer.
For all of those people who do not understand why the flag is moving, it is simple dynamics. They all say wind is needed to move the flag. Why would you think that? As the flag is being moved by the astronauts, the lack of an atmosphere reduced the resistance on the flag. The flag has momentum from the astronauts who moved it. Get your minds away from your “no wind” ideas. If someone spins you around in space, like the astronauts did to the flag pole, you would move for a while too.
About the shadows not being parallel. Come on, you never heard of perspectives before? If the ground is flat, yes, the shadows from a single light source WILL be parallel. But how on Earth (no pun intended) will shadows APPEAR parallel when the ground itself (near the lunar lander) is not parallel to the foreground shadows.
I believe the landing was real. I can NOT prove it nor do I want to even attempt to prove it. However, I can state evidence against the dumb hoax myths. These things have even recently been shown as fake myths on TV. It will always be one word versus another. For every piece of suspected hoax belief is a piece of evidence supporting the landing. There are only a few people that know 100% whether the landing was real or not: the Apollo crew who supposedly landed.
Explain the Crater or lack of dude???
And if someone was to spin you in space you would spin forever until some other force acted against your motion.
Gravity has a funny way of pulling on hanging things.
All they need to do to prove the moon landing is to get a really powerful telescope focus it on the moon and look for the American Flag that was allegedly place on the moon by Neil Armstrong.
There are a few websites that explain telescope resolution limits. Visit them sometime.
Again, Myth busters.
all these explainations are fine, but does anyone have proof that the moon landing WASN’T done in a studio? i mean what if the laser reflection thing is just the natural reflectivity of the moon?
It’s been proven that lasers naturally reflect off the moon, so do radio waves
You lie. It is absolutely proven that the Laser doesn’t reflect naturally from the Moon’s surface. So don’t lie. You’re liar.
Broken record… I mean myth busters moon landing hoax…