Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof by Dale Schroader.

Actually, if there HAD been a crater, that would have proven something was indeed wrong with the moon landing. Just use a search engine for “moon hoax debunked” (or something along those lines) and you will find many good sites that can explain ALL the hoaxers’ anomalies. Just remember, in over forty years, NO accredited scientist has EVER rejected the scientific explainations of ANY of these anomalies. If the conspiracy’s that big…it’s too late. We’re already all slaves to the illuminati. And if so, I’ll just drink another beer, surf the net, go where ever I want to go (well mostly), when I want to go, just like any other day of my life and think, “these illuminati guys…they’re allright”.

More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof by Dale Schroader


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

I weep for your educational system. …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

Of course it can and has. It’s called “perspective”. Actually one of the easiest things to show. Here’s one example from a totally un-moon hoax (pro or con) related site. “http://www.pasty.com/discuss/messages/1779/1872.html#PN” Its just the top picture that …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

It’s called math and science. I highly recommend it. …


More Comments by Dale Schroader


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

I weep for your educational system. …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

Of course it can and has. It’s called “perspective”. Actually one of the easiest things to show. Here’s one example from a totally un-moon hoax (pro or con) related site. “http://www.pasty.com/discuss/messages/1779/1872.html#PN” Its just the top picture that …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

It’s called math and science. I highly recommend it. …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax

First of all, from what I have seen, the radiation dose estimates hoax theory believers suggest are invalid (more to come later).
Secondly, I don’t think anyone pro or con on the hoax debate is a “sheep”, “idiot”, etc. …