Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof by LunarOrbit.

those were EXAMPLES of govt lies,

Examples which were totally irrelevant. It doesn’t matter if the US government lied about a billion things, it does not prove they lied about Apollo. Even habitual liars tell the truth sometimes.

If you want to prove that Apollo was faked you have to prove it with evidence relevant to Apollo.

i dont think just because the flag waved when no one touched it that the whole program was a hoax. that is just one in MANY inconsistencies with the whole apollo missions. thats why i gave other examples.

And your other examples were just as flawed as your flag example. You have ignored other explanations and jumped to the conclusion that Apollo was a hoax. You haven’t done any research, you have simply chosen to believe what you want to believe.

of course they couldve lift it with a crane,

Sure they could, but WHY would they do that? Why lift something with a crane if it has wheels and can be pushed or driven to where you want it? Do you think NASA is a bunch of idiots? Don’t you think they would have realized that the rover should be leaving tracks?

It makes a whole lot more sense that the rover tracks are just not visible from the angle the photograph was taken or that the tracks were disturbed by that astronauts.

there was probably more than one there like on movie sets..

Show me a picture of one of these cranes then. The astronauts took 360 degree panoramic photographs and video of the lunar surface… where is the support structure for the crane?

as far as the LEM kicking up dust. sure the astronauts said they were kicking up dust. but when you look at the pics, there is no dust no disturbance no nothing..

Yes, there is. You just aren’t looking hard enough.

If you look at the following picture you’ll see the lines in the lunar surface caused by the blast from the descent engine.

http://bit.ly/hfA7pF

NASA couldve easily sent an unmanned probe to the apollo sites and have the probe set up the laser refractors

You think that is plausible? I think it’s ridiculous.

In order to do that NASA engineers would have had to design, build, test, and launch those robotic landers without anyone spilling the beans. And how did they hide the rocket launches that sent the robots to the Moon?

and then easily say yeah thats where we landed..NASA couldve easily sent unmanned probes to the landing site with “apollo equipment” and when photographed say oh yeah there is remnants of the apollo mission..

Wouldn’t it be easier to just send astronauts to the Moon? This is what I find so funny about conspiracy nuts like you… your theories are more complicated than actually sending people to the Moon would be. Your theories are a joke.

More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof by LunarOrbit


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

Please explain the van Allen belts to me how does any one survive that

The Apollo spacecraft avoided most of the Van Allen Belt (VAB). The VAB does not fully encompass the Earth… it’s more like a donut or a thick …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

Gravity on the Moon is 1/6th as strong as it is on Earth, but it does exist. So the dust would fall to the ground a little bit slower on the Moon, but it would fall. Also, gravity affects all …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

Sorry to break the news to you but the government does lie to us.

I’m sure they do, but how does that prove Apollo was a hoax? Just because someone lied about one thing doesn’t mean that EVERYTHING they say is …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

“There were six moon landings (Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17) and two lunar orbiting or flyby missions (Apollo 10 and 13).”

Doh… another mistake. There were 3 lunar orbiting or flyby missions, not 2. Apollo 8 and 10 …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

“No one with any real knowledge of Apollo believes it was faked. Even the Russians, who would have had a lot to gain from exposing a hoax, believe that NASA faked it all.”

Oops… small typo there. Obviously I meant “Even …


More Comments by LunarOrbit


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence

My main concern is that if they really did land on the moon in 1969, then why was there not a single attempt to repeat the feat

Ummm… NASA landed men on the Moon five more times after Apollo 11.

Don’t we …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

For me it is that easy to say that the moon landings never happened.

Then you’re a gullible fool who hasn’t bothered to learn anything about Apollo.

And in a sense they never did because I wasn’t born yet when they occurred.

What …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

I did not verify any of the “facts” stated here

Maybe you should. You’d look less like a fool if you didn’t constantly cite unverified claims.

Even if most of the alleged US Moon rocks are real, the Russians were able to …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

That is why no one takes you HBs seriously. You can’t get your stories straight. We see HBs saying robotic probes put the laser reflectors on the Moon… and then other HBs who say the lasers were simply reflected off …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

You can reflect a laser off the moon’s surface.
No reflector required.

True, but a lot more of the laser’s light is reflected when a reflector is used. The reflectors reflect all light back in the direction it came from. Light reflected …