Moon landing photographs are the main argument for the Apollo conspiracy believers, as there are thousands of moon photographs that have anomalies on them. (i.e.: […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence
John: I don’t even know if it’s worth commenting on your comment.. BUT, they have used green screens, before, still do, and always will. Insert image in the background, poof. There’s your Earth in space.
The landings ALL were real you bunch of wankers, it was the astronauts who were fake
i believe that the landing was a hoax!
I suspect that the Apollo missions did no more that just orbit the moon
and that the only people who were aware of this were the astronauts
themselves, the president and his close advisers. I do not believe that
any of the so called evidence supports this hoax theory though. I just
believe that the missions were so complex and the chances of a disaster
were so high that common sense dictated that it just wasn’t worth the
risk. American astronauts crashing into the moon, failing to take off
again or failing to rendezvous in orbit would have been the certain
outcome and that would have been very bad for American prestige. As the
president had already pledged to go to the moon a hoax landing was the
only logical solution to the problem. The missions therefore left earth
with a full mission payload for a landing plus a bag of rocks from the
desert and some exposed film from a film set. The landing payload was
jettisoned into space for the return trip and the rocks and film were
handed over as evidence of a successful mission.
lol..oh my god .. OK Ray .. So they did all that .. 5 more times??? WHY??? All they had to do to cover their ass with the crazy promise Kennedy made 7 years before was to go ONE TIME. No reason to do it 5 MORE TIMES!!….lol Does anyone use their head anymore???
Gordon Sheppard is the ONLY person who has the right idea. Thousands of people were involved in planning building and coordinating the equipment and space-craft required to land on the moon. Gordon Sheppard is the ONLY person commenting on this page to realise that if it was fake one of these thousands of people woulde have talked already! For the love of God get over yourselves and stop fearing space travel and worming around the truth. AND if that doesn’t convince you, look in the reflections of the astronauts helmet visors. NO studio! The flag waves because the engine exaust gasses expand rapidly into the vacuum space! Yes if you play the moon landing a 6 times speed it looks like jumping on earth, gravity on moon is a sixth of that on earth! Put 2 and 2 together you get 4 not 3. Get the point! IT WAS NOT FAKE, YOU CANT PROVE TRUTH WRONG.
am still bit confunsed to dicide who’s wrong or right,but my question is,if the flag waved because the engene was running,how come it did not sweep away footprints?but if they were taken here on earth and the flag waved because the was air,wouldn’t be dust in the air and in the land lunner? please convince me
The Moon Hoax enthusiasts have a lot to say regarding things they know very little about.
Here’s a list of things to go look up: 1. Basic photography – This’ll help you understand how many shadows an object has to have if lit from multiple sources.
2. Image flattening – Photographs are 2 dimensional renderings of 3 dimensional objects. The shadow irregularities are a result of subtracting depth (breadth) and leaving only height and width. We can no longer perceive the irregularities in the Moon’s surface that influence the orientation of shadows. 3. Film developing – Because the astronauts wore fairly cumbersome gloves, they were not able to do more than pull a shutter trigger on the Hasselblad cameras harnessed to their space suits. Neither could they look through the veiwfinder. They simply pointed and shot. The cameras were designed for automatically setting the aperture and shutter speed. Even then, the high contrast of the Moon’s surface and the blackness of the sky caused some exposure problems. These were addressed back on Earth when the films were developed and printed. This in part explains why astronauts in the shadow of any object are not completely obliderated from view. On the other hand, go outside on a sunny day and stand in the shadow of your house. Hold your hand out in front of you. Surprise! You can still see your hand. 4. The Moon’s surface – It’s useful to know that the Moon’s regolith (dirt) is pwdery in texture. It’s even more helpful to understand it’s composition. Under electron microscopes, the regolith proves to be tiny beads of volcanic glass. This gives the Moon’s surface extraordinary refractive and reflective properties, much like the heiligenschein produced on dewey grass. This helps to further explain why the astronauts are not obscured by shadows as well as the so-called “hot spot” created by studio lighting.
Spend as much time researching the science of Project Apollo as you have wasted reading conspiracy theories and you’ll probably learn something.
There have been several people who have come forward from NASA who admitted to NASA airbrushing out pictures because they were taken on a set at an undisclosed location. Scientists who have examined the supposed moon rocks have stated the moon rocks are identical to our earth rocks. How could anyone identify or compare rocks from earth – from rocks from earth that were supposedly taken from the moon especialy 800 plus pounds? Secondly if you watch alot of the different videos out there you can see the spotlight images in the backround, off the reflective visors of the astronauts along with my favorite the flag waving. Not when anyone was touching it, but after several minutes when it was still and an astronaut walked by and it started to wave. there was about 5-7 feet between him and the flag. Also its obvious they were using wires. The videos show numerous shots of the astronauts falling on the ground and they are trying to get up, and it looks like they are getting YANKED BACKWARDS up to thier feet. I used to admire the Apollo program until I started noticing these little discrepancies and i had no idea there were was this HOAX about the program. The more I watch the more bogus it seems. The reason HUBBLE can survive is because it was made for this enviroment within the close proximenity of earth. Why dont the space shuttle travel out further or why isnt the ISP out further. We could have built a station right on the moon and launched form there we could have conserved on gas and sent out deeper probes. And with moons unobstructed atmosphere we could see much further. Another question I want to pose is this. How big is the moon compared to the earth? Home come it only takes a minute or so to land on the moon but it takes close to several hours for the shuttle to land, besides atmospheric issues?
i think you are right about this and according to the info and pics you have a lot of evidence!!. well done,good job,nobody would have found out but you!!cya later
from Teasha Mcinnes
I wonder what happened to the people who came forward,that was quite brave.