Moon landing photographs are the main argument for the Apollo conspiracy believers, as there are thousands of moon photographs that have anomalies on them. (i.e.: […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence
Moon landing photographs are the main argument for the Apollo conspiracy believers, as there are thousands of moon photographs that have anomalies on them. (i.e.: […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence
I wonder how the astronauts feel about this?
Where are the stars? without atmosphere… shouldn’t they be extremely bright? why the earth looks so small in the pictures (so few pictures)?.
Also, many ligths should produce many shadows…
Russians also have fakes, and NASA may know them.
Miguel, without the atmosphere the suns light almost completely blocks out the starlight
were the Moon landing real? were they faked? who knows? one day the truth will come out and when it does, one group of people will be vindicated in their theories, and the other will make excuses as to why the truth isn’t the truth. in my opinion, the landing were faked. you can try to debunk all the theories you want, there are some things such as how the Astronauts righted themselves after falling down that is just impossible to explain without there being a cable or some other means to right them. if i’m wrong, i’m wrong, but i have the right to believe what i want to. and that’s the point.
The most compelling evidence I saw that convinced me that trickery was being used to say the least or out and out fraud on the part of Nasa was this. The sun’s reflection onto the helmets of the space suits changes drastically. The legitimate photos reflect the sun as a spiked image having lines that seem to spike up and down from the center of the sun. Some of the reflections looked like the reflection of florescent lighting or some other man made light. You can not fake the reflection of the sun.
Regards, Ted
My thoughts are simple…if they went to the moon why in this day and age has no one gone again? For sure we have a way better understanding on how to get there now. 40 years is a long time not to go back. If they turn the Hubble towards the moon they should be able to take images of the earth items left behind.
Prove all things
Cheers,
Bob
the reason no one has gone again is because theres really no point too, theres nothing up there
Get medical help, you need it if you believe the Apollo fairy story.
Hey bob. Yes a spy satellite can see objects such as an airplane or car or even a person from orbit, but it’s only about 200 miles above the surface of the earth, whereas Hubble is 250,000 miles from the moon, so it is impossible for Hubble or any ground based telescope to see any of the objects that man left on the moon including the descent stage of the LM which was left there and was about 5m across. If the spy satellites were that far away, they woldn’t be able to see a football field.
First it’s actually only about 37 years since the last landing (the first was 40 years ago). Second, since the only rocket which could lift a large enough payload into orbit to go to the moon, was discontinued in favor of the reusable space shuttle it was impossible for the U.S. to go back. If they had continued flights after going 9 times and landing 6 times, wouldn’t that have been considered by most people to be a waste of money.
Things are proven if you look at the real evidence.
Jim: about the size of the sun and moon appearing the same. Yes this is true now, but far enough in the past the moon was closer and would have appeared larger in the sky than the sun. Conversely, for off in the future it will be noticebly smaller because it will be farther away (maybe in a million years or so). So the coincindence is not that they appear to be the same size, but rather that we are living in a time when this is the case.
Chris asked why is there no photos of Armstrong on the moon. This refers to still photos, there is however video and 16mm movie film of the moon walk with both Armstrong and Aldrin in them. It was Armstrong who had the still camera (at least most of the time) and so the photos are of Aldrin.
Baratacus Your coments about the film are not true. The film would not over heat anymore than on cameras taken on a space shuttle space walk. The temperature on the moon refers to the surface. Since there is no air to conduct the heat to the film in the camera (it is in a vacuum inside the camera) it remains cool because it is insulated by the vacuum just as if it was in a thermos bottle. The camera was also metallic (silver in color) and therefore reflected the heat of the sun. If the film would over heat, why wouldn’t this happen to any other astronaut’s film that did a spacewalk in low earth orbit, or do you believe those are fake too.
One other thing, the rest of the would does not believe the landings were fake, I am not an American, and know the landings did happen, and so did the Soviets who put it on page one of Pravda (the government controlled newspaper) the day after apollo 11 landed. Once the lost the race to the moon, they quite their moon program, since being second would not have looked any better than not going at all.
View Comment
In 2005, Nasa said it would take them 25 years or so to be able to send a man to the moon in a fully funded project. Strange even though technology has advanced many fold since the first claimed mission. The space shuttles have never traveled more than 400 miles from Earth and have yet claimed more astronaut lives than the original “moon” missions.
Why haven’t the Russians ever gone to the moon? Because they can’t. Just like we can’t. You think for a minute that they would let us lay sole claim to the moon? Riiiight.
Better to have said:
“That’s one small step for man in a pressurized space suit; one giant leap for mankind.”
The moon does not support life. Without the suit they would die instantly.
Where can I see a photo of the famous’C’ rock? Thanks
Right here (http://hubpages.com/hub/NASA-Moon-Hoax-Rocks-With-Writing-On-Them). Peace.
I find it incredibly frustrating that all the comments from “skeptics” indicate a general lack of understanding of simple mechanics and physics. In other words they are generally “uneducated”. Why bother making a comment based on Dumb thinking. This is reinforced by the fact most of them can not even spell correctly.
P.S. They probably dont even believe the tooth fairy exists!!
Another one whose brain is not functioning correctly. Get medical help for fox sake.