Hey bob. Yes a spy satellite can see objects such as

Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence by STMan.

Hey bob. Yes a spy satellite can see objects such as an airplane or car or even a person from orbit, but it’s only about 200 miles above the surface of the earth, whereas Hubble is 250,000 miles from the moon, so it is impossible for Hubble or any ground based telescope to see any of the objects that man left on the moon including the descent stage of the LM which was left there and was about 5m across. If the spy satellites were that far away, they woldn’t be able to see a football field.
First it’s actually only about 37 years since the last landing (the first was 40 years ago). Second, since the only rocket which could lift a large enough payload into orbit to go to the moon, was discontinued in favor of the reusable space shuttle it was impossible for the U.S. to go back. If they had continued flights after going 9 times and landing 6 times, wouldn’t that have been considered by most people to be a waste of money.

Things are proven if you look at the real evidence.

Jim: about the size of the sun and moon appearing the same. Yes this is true now, but far enough in the past the moon was closer and would have appeared larger in the sky than the sun. Conversely, for off in the future it will be noticebly smaller because it will be farther away (maybe in a million years or so). So the coincindence is not that they appear to be the same size, but rather that we are living in a time when this is the case.

Chris asked why is there no photos of Armstrong on the moon. This refers to still photos, there is however video and 16mm movie film of the moon walk with both Armstrong and Aldrin in them. It was Armstrong who had the still camera (at least most of the time) and so the photos are of Aldrin.

Baratacus Your coments about the film are not true. The film would not over heat anymore than on cameras taken on a space shuttle space walk. The temperature on the moon refers to the surface. Since there is no air to conduct the heat to the film in the camera (it is in a vacuum inside the camera) it remains cool because it is insulated by the vacuum just as if it was in a thermos bottle. The camera was also metallic (silver in color) and therefore reflected the heat of the sun. If the film would over heat, why wouldn’t this happen to any other astronaut’s film that did a spacewalk in low earth orbit, or do you believe those are fake too.

One other thing, the rest of the would does not believe the landings were fake, I am not an American, and know the landings did happen, and so did the Soviets who put it on page one of Pravda (the government controlled newspaper) the day after apollo 11 landed. Once the lost the race to the moon, they quite their moon program, since being second would not have looked any better than not going at all.