Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence by STMan.

Here’s some answers to your questions.

Question: Who filmed Armstrong as he took his first steps: Answer: No one. Armstrong pulled on a D-ring, which deployed a black & white video camera which was stored in the instrument bay.

Question: How did they send their signal from the moon. Answer: The moon is close relative to Mars, Jupiter, Saturn and the other planets that unmanned probes have been to. All of which can send a strong enough signal for the large parabolic antennaes back on Earth to receive. So the signal was easy to pick up from the relatively close distance of the moon.

Question: How did they take of their helmets to eat and drink. Answer: They only could take of their helmets when they were inside the lunar module, which was pressurized with oxygen, so that they could breath without their helmets on.

Question: Didn’t the lunar rover run a long time without charging. Answer: The longest was apollo 17, which logged 4 hours and 26 min. But remember, it did this as a very light vehicle in one sixth gravity.

Question: Would it not take 10 times as long to get back to Earth: Answer: No. When the command module engines were fired to get them out of lunar orbit and send them back to earth, the Earths gravity was used to accelerate the craft as it headed back. It picked up speed just as any object does when it falls to Earth. Also because most of the fuel was used on the way there, there was not as much mass for the engines to accelerate.

Other comments: There was unmanned missions to the moon before the astronauts risked their lives. To say they faked the footage shows that you haven’t looked at all of the evidence. The moon landing were shown live on TV, with the astronauts communicating with ground control in Houston. The transmissions were listened to by several countries around the world, including the Soviet Union, who reported about the 1st moon landing on page one of Pravda, their govermnent controlled news paper. As well, the apollo missions were tracked by Britain and Austrailian astronomers, who used their large parabolic antanneas to listen to the communications. If they had not gone, there would have been no transmissions.

So why don’t they go now? Isn’t technology better now? First the fact that they don’t go now isn’t proof that they never went, but there is plans for a new heavy lifting rocket which can return astronauts to the moon in about 10 or 12 years if the schedule is kept. Currently it isn’t possible to go since the Saturn V rocket was discontinued, and replaced by the reusable space shuttle, which is only for low Earth orbit.

More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence by STMan


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence

Hey bob. Yes a spy satellite can see objects such as an airplane or car or even a person from orbit, but it’s only about 200 miles above the surface of the earth, whereas Hubble is 250,000 miles from …


More Comments by STMan


Bible Conspiracy Theory

If your a Christian who want to be a priest, why are you using foul language? …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

Watch the video again. The flag only moves when the astronauts are near it, either touching the flag or the pole. The flag is supported by a horizontal rod a the top of the pole (like a curtain …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Camera Problems

The “C” was not on the rock, it was only on a duplicate photo, but not the original. The “C” rock photo is AS16-107-17446 you can do a search of the original on NASA’s archive.

http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html

The same rock …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence

Hey bob. Yes a spy satellite can see objects such as an airplane or car or even a person from orbit, but it’s only about 200 miles above the surface of the earth, whereas Hubble is 250,000 miles from …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

I think of heard almost every argument against the landings, and they are easily answerable. The picture of Aldrin shown above for example, is over exposed to make the astronauts suit brighter. Proof: Look at the …