Yes jfb (above) I looked at http://www.spacex.com (Falcon 9) and also on Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/spacexchannel
http://www.youtube.com/spacexchannel#p/c/F0D3A9748DC5E42D/1/UTwRxtmQ9IY
This is not very good evidence because the most important video is animation. However, they show flame even from a large distance. The NASA videos show no flame from a close distance, see the Lift-offs for yourself:
Apollo 15
Apollo 16
Apollo 17
NO FLAME.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. We do not even have a shred of evidence of any Man on the Moon, much less extraordinary evidence.
Neil Armstrong summed it well up on the 25th Anniversary of Apollo 11:
-“The only bird that can talk is the parrot, but, he cant fly very well”
It is time to correct our encyclopaedias: “NASA Apollo Moon landing claims have no scientific evidence. All the Moon landing evidence could have been fabricated on Earth.”
More Comments by Alex
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof
NASA image: AS17-141-21608HR from:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21608HR.jpg
(Who took the picture? The person -stage worker- in the helmet’s reflection does not have a camera on his chest and a life support system on his back, and he is not facing in the right direction …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof
My best answer to rrc’s question (above):
NASA image: AS17-141-21608HR from:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21608HR.jpg
The magnified helmet of AS17-141-21608HR
Who took the picture? The person (stage worker) in the helmet’s reflection does not have a camera and he is not facing in the right direction. After …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
When you watch the videos of the lift-offs one thing is clear: “This is not an acceptable evidence of Lunar landing.”. Why? The quality is so poor that anybody could have created these videos on Earth. No proof, not even …
LIFT OFF WITHOUT DUST AND FLAME
Apollo 15,16,17 Lift off: Lack of blowing dust and lack of flame. NASA believers claim that there should not have been a flame, dust etc…
For the Apollo lunar ascent and descent module single main engine and sixteen attitude control thrusters, …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence
I find that the people who do not believe the NASA story are generally better educated, but it is more important that they are INDEPENDENT thinkers.
Many of the Apollo Moon photos have the stars in them if you lighten up …
More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence by Alex
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
When you watch the videos of the lift-offs one thing is clear: “This is not an acceptable evidence of Lunar landing.”. Why? The quality is so poor that anybody could have created these videos on Earth. No proof, not even …
LIFT OFF WITHOUT DUST AND FLAME
Apollo 15,16,17 Lift off: Lack of blowing dust and lack of flame. NASA believers claim that there should not have been a flame, dust etc…
For the Apollo lunar ascent and descent module single main engine and sixteen attitude control thrusters, …