Comment on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence by Alex.

When you watch the videos of the lift-offs one thing is clear: “This is not an acceptable evidence of Lunar landing.”. Why? The quality is so poor that anybody could have created these videos on Earth. No proof, not even a shred of evidence in them.

Lift offs, Apollo 15, 16, 17:

All other discussion ultimately is superfluous about these videos.

However, from a single engine starting from cold looking it from a very close distance the flame should be visible.
no atmospheric pressure, visible flame:
http://ocii.com/~dpwozney/apollo1.htm

The case of the Apollo Program should be decided looking at all the evidence or rather the complete lack of evidence. The first analysis of lunar rocks should have been a comparison of the Apollo rocks with lunar rocks originating from the Antarctica. Such a study has never been carried out, even though no scientist is that stupid as to miss that one. The decision not to carry out this comparison/analysis must have come from NASA management and not from the scientists.
I.e.: We come short handed again, not a shred of evidence.

Presently there is enough information to compare the Russian, Apollo and Antarctic lunar material. Many is on the internet but you have to pay for some of them.
Analysis of the Apollo lunar material indicate that it is very “Earth like”, that is why the present theory of the Moon’s creation is that the Moon comes from a collision of the Earth with an other Planet/object. Almost all other evidence than the Apollo lunar material indicate other scenarios for the creation of the Moon.

No matter where we look: THERE IS NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE FOR MEN LANDING ON THE MOON.

And that is where the discussion should start. Then we can discuss whether NASA Astronauts landed on the Moon, even though the pictures look like composite and manipulated images, the videos are poor quality and the claimed lunar rocks are or aren’t from the Moon. There are legitimate excuses for most of these, but is there enough reason for all of that?

More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence by Alex


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

Yes jfb (above) I looked at http://www.spacex.com (Falcon 9) and also on Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/spacexchannel
http://www.youtube.com/spacexchannel#p/c/F0D3A9748DC5E42D/1/UTwRxtmQ9IY
This is not very good evidence because the most important video is animation. However, they show flame even from a large distance. The NASA videos show no …


LIFT OFF WITHOUT DUST AND FLAME

Apollo 15,16,17 Lift off: Lack of blowing dust and lack of flame. NASA believers claim that there should not have been a flame, dust etc…
For the Apollo lunar ascent and descent module single main engine and sixteen attitude control thrusters, …


More Comments by Alex


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

NASA image: AS17-141-21608HR from:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21608HR.jpg
(Who took the picture? The person -stage worker- in the helmet’s reflection does not have a camera on his chest and a life support system on his back, and he is not facing in the right direction …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof

My best answer to rrc’s question (above):

NASA image: AS17-141-21608HR from:
http://history.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21608HR.jpg

The magnified helmet of AS17-141-21608HR

Who took the picture? The person (stage worker) in the helmet’s reflection does not have a camera and he is not facing in the right direction. After …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence

Yes jfb (above) I looked at http://www.spacex.com (Falcon 9) and also on Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/spacexchannel
http://www.youtube.com/spacexchannel#p/c/F0D3A9748DC5E42D/1/UTwRxtmQ9IY
This is not very good evidence because the most important video is animation. However, they show flame even from a large distance. The NASA videos show no …


LIFT OFF WITHOUT DUST AND FLAME

Apollo 15,16,17 Lift off: Lack of blowing dust and lack of flame. NASA believers claim that there should not have been a flame, dust etc…
For the Apollo lunar ascent and descent module single main engine and sixteen attitude control thrusters, …


Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence

I find that the people who do not believe the NASA story are generally better educated, but it is more important that they are INDEPENDENT thinkers.
Many of the Apollo Moon photos have the stars in them if you lighten up …