The most consistently seen argument of moon hoax believers, is why, in a land with no air, the American flag stands up and waves, instead […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Video Evidence
to jason i agree with you completly why when it landed the retro rockets did not disturb the surfaceyet a footprint showed up distinctly also why have we never seen any evidence of the lander ,they show us pictures of the lunar surface yet never one picture of the landing site?
It doesn’t matter because Dan Halen from Squidbillies is now the owner of the moon.
In zero air resistance, (no atmosphere) the flag would keep moving after Armstrong twisted it in.
scienceseeker scienceseeker scienceseeker Your funny the man on the moon. extra hydrogen atom to attach to certain grains laying all over the surface of the moon–stripping this atom is UFO fuel. Little green mans Arco. You must have the homey hook up on the Green Buds? Because your out there.Oh I bet you get it from the Little Green Men Store my bad
some people need to turn off their ipods, disconnect the iphone, cell phone, back away from the video game and wonder outside and breathe deep! you need a bit of fresh air, eh?
some people need to turn off their ipods, disconnect the iphone, cell phone, back away from the video game and wonder outside and breathe deep! you need a bit of fresh air, eh? you all have just a bit too much free time, eh?
Seriously…why do all these “conspiracies” ignore facts?
The laser research was questioned: Yet, the labs have offered to the doubters the manuscripts involved when the astronaughts set the reflectrs in place. No conspiracist was interested.
Why didn’t the dirt move when the lander left? The loose dirt was already cleared from the landing, what was left below the lander, as is evidenced by voice recordings of the astronaughts assesments, was almost nothing but granite.
The flag waving in an atmosphere: Here;s a dandy, it couldnt be reproduced easily in Earths gravity, and it is obvious to someone who is capable of being objective, the flag only waves when the radio arms are being handled. It also maintains it’s shape and NEVER moves when it is just there by itself.
The stage prop: Already proven that the C was a light anomaly.
Where are modern pictures? people who have spent more than a generation discreditting pictures…who want pictures as evidence…odd. Nevermind the telescope in New Zealand that has zoomed in on the landing site and offered to show conspiracists the landers, rover and reflector plate. Again, funny enough, no conspiracists took this offer up either to “see for themselves”.
I know, let’s not cloud the issue with facts. We would all be much hapier believing the moon is a fairy tale, JFK was assassinated by an internation consortium, the illuminati owns you and Zionists own them, Pearl Harbor was set up, The Holocaust never happened, 9-11 was a government operation and martians are using brain wave emitters to control us.
Take your meds and STFU geeks.
I never even realised that the moon landings were in dispute until about a year ago.(British) What fascinates me, is that there are a lot of very good, well thought out, factually approached arguments that have been put forward by the sceptics (some crazy ones too) but every time I read someones attemt to debunk, they are vague, generalising, dismisive and contradictory just like this one. The writer states that there was no dust on take off because it had been blasted away on landing. Funny that, because I earlier read from another debunker that there was no dust in the landing videos on landing because there was no air, and the rocket only produced 1 1/2 lb per inch of pressure. If your not sure whether we went, google reflections in Visors, and even more obvious, consider why there is no video footage of the earth in the background in any of the missions.
There are photos of the earth behind them. sheesh!
There are no telescopes on earth that can show you the surface of the moon clearly…Hence why these conspiracy mongers declined the invitation(if there ever was one)…As funny as the conspirators can be, to me what’s even funnier is people that make fun of them by making up their own series of “truths” or “facts”…Bottom line, people are gonna believe what they wanna believe & nothing you or I can say will change that.Was the 1969 moon landing a hoax?As well as other missions afterwards?Maybe.The only ones who know for certain are the ones who were a part of it.And if it was a hoax…They ain’t talking.
You know what i dont understand. Someone claimed ownership of the moon. Since when did our laws extend to outside the very planet we live on. Maybe the reason they dont go back to the moon is because they are not alowd on other peoples property lol. I supose someone wants mars also. How far are we willing to go untill something bad happens. Imagine if earth is owned by something else out there. Maybe some weird race which owns a planet trading business. Hey lets all go to international waters cause you have less laws than you do on the moon.
I had a look at google moon today. It shows where the landing sites are said to be and all and its even got little models of the craft that landed there but under the model theres no image of the craft. The detail is really high isnt there ment to be pictures of what ever we left there. Like i mean the 3d models on google earth, you take the models away and you see the picture of the building under it. Wheres the stuff on the moon?
Yea, and there were the WMDs, Kuwait’s infants removed from their incubator’s as seen by the daughter of the emir all bought by the millions worldwide my ass. What’s next?