Whether the conspiracy was possible or if there was a motive for faking the landings, is a big part of the moon hoax. Many conspiracy […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?
“But the conspiracy believers haven’t given ‘conclusive’ proof … ”
Is it really the responsibility of so-called “conspiracy theorists” to “prove” man didn’t land on the moon?
No. The burden of proof lies with those who claim man did land on the moon.
I can see no reason to trust the word of the government or its agents.
I am not convinced man did walk on the moon… I saw it on TV, but that doesn’t prove anything.
I have yet to see convincing proof that any man did actually land on the moon.
Sorry, no, that’s not how it works. NASA has made its claim (we sent people to the Moon), and has backed it up with physical evidence (samples, science data from instruments left on the Moon), documentary evidence (film, still photographs, video, audio, telemetry, reports, budgets, memoranda), and eyewitness evidence from the astronauts and engineers (logs, mission reports).
The burden of proof is now on the other side to provide evidence *for* their position that the landings were faked.
It’s not enough to say that the film and video footage was “obviously” shot on a sound stage in the desert; *you* have to provide evidence that such a sound stage existed in the first place *and* that all the published images were shot on that stage, preferably by showing images from “backstage” like lighting trusses, sound stage walls, wires, exterior shots of the stage, etc. Where was it? How did they simulate 1/6 gravity? How did they evacuate all the air from it to keep the dust from floating after it was kicked up? Who built the sound stage? Who worked there? Who paid them? How were they paid? Where did the money come from? Find me a paper trail for *that* and we can start talking seriously.
It’s not enough to say that the samples are “obviously” fake; *you* have to provide the evidence showing *where* and *how* those fake samples were created. Were they created synthetically in a lab? Were dug up somewhere on Earth? Who decided what properties the samples had to possess to pass for genuine? And again, who created them, how were they paid for their efforts, and where did that money come from? Again, if you can find a paper trail for that, THEN you have a real case against NASA.
It’s not enough to say that the photographs are “obviously” doctored. *You* have to find and show the original, undoctored versions, and compare them to the official images. *You* have to show *how* they were doctored.
It’s not enough to say that the science equipment was “obviously” placed by unmanned probes; *you* have to show evidence that those probes actually existed *and* that they carried the instrument packages supposedly left by the astronauts. When and where were those probes launched? Who built them? How were they paid? Where did the money come from? Again, find me a paper trail for those other probes.
It’s not enough to say that the radiation in the Van Allen belts or on the lunar surface would have “obviously” killed the astronauts. What type of radiation are you talking about? What are the amounts? Where did you get your measurements from? Are they accurate and current (at least for the time frame of the Apollo missions)? How did you calculate the lethal dosage?
That’s the kind of stuff you have to come up with to *credibly* challenge the authenticity of the Apollo missions.
people walk on the moon becuase me and my best friend just got back for moon walk thats right i am in the iss right now got to go work bye
God I hate conspiracy theorists
yes but you should never say or wite that word tata
Man has not walked on moon. There are to many things going on in our own world to worry about the moon. The Moon is not that important and the other Plantes are not that important either.
okay so I don’t really believe either side on this. I’m kind of skeptical on both sides. However, I enjoy considering possibilities.
First of all, there’s the possibility that the government was also duped and that NASA is an agency that siphons off billions from tax payers and lies about it’s true costs. Perhaps they could even work with the federal reserve who isn’t audited and has printing presses.
There’s also a much more far fetched idea that secret societies brainwash and recruit members and through those societies they erase people, fake deaths and come up with new aliases. Secret societies of this nature definately exists and freemasonry is a very large secret society with tons of influencial people involved, however I really doubt even an orginization with all of the supposed “secrets” could engineer something on this grand of a scale.
But lets not get out into left field here, and just stick to the possibility that a few people at NASA are acting alone here. I believe your statement about the fact that in a minimal conspiracy that NASA has to make a flight worthy rocket is wrong.
1) Compartmentaize the process so most people are in the dark about what function they are doing. They build it parts at a time, and they build test rockets as well as real ones think about it.
2) Have the amatures, interns, and understudies told they’re building a test rocket, when they’re building the real thing which that way is much cheaper
3) Have those who know their stuff be told they are building a test rocket, which actually gets used in the real rocket. You essentially build 2 test rockets however those working on it believe that “the other team” was working on the real one. Since they only work at one part at a time and there’s a million people working for NASA it wouldn’t be that hard to keep everyone in the dark about the fact that there is no “real” rocket. Building 2 cheap “test” rockets that only need to go in orbit around the earth and come back and land would probably be much cheaper than
Additionally the costs can probably be overstated on every individual item and add up to a lot more.
The only real thing I find compelling is the radiation belt and how everyone believed that passing through it was next to impossible. I heard that the combined calculated probabilities of being able to not only pass through the radiation belt, but also land, eturn, and come down through the radiation belt again and then land, given the reported circumstances was something like less than 3%.
And why black and white cameras when they had color cameras in the spaceship. The video I attached has some compelling information.
Never met any detractors to ANY conspiracy who wasn’t an employee of the various groups.I think it should be made well note that James Angleton and others were higher calibur people than the CIA brats of today. Think what you will of them, but they are saints compared to todays spies and godless cronies. They actually were patriots, however messed up most of them were mentally, like Frank Sturgis. They really loved America. Today our leaders should be executed under laws of treason, and the fact they aren’t being hung from Howard Hughes and Nixon on down is because our country is finished. Lately, Van Alan Radiation Belt Vidoes are being blocked. From what i can gather , CIA employees really seem quite clueless as to who or what they actually work for or any definable mission. It’s safe to say we can go to the Moon now, for the rich bankers.We live in a failing Plutocracy that will fall to Islam and the Pope.Ruled covertly in Europe. Fighting the new world order is kicking yourself as the “new world order” failed.I doubt W and Billy Graham and Obama and Jews are welcome in the Vatican and Nazi Europe, they aren’t welcome in Islam.You guys should start a journey to the center of the Earth…oh wait, you already are on that one.
We landed on the moon if not it would have got out by now. All your thinking about is the American public and the U.S. goverment. How many other countries have space programs? Plenty of them, think of how much they would love to reveal the moon landing as a hoax. It’s been nearly 50 years and they haven’t yet. The people who make these theories up are fucking idiots and everyone that believes them has got to be even dumber.
Have fun with your Aluminum Hats.
If you’re going to try and convince people, you first have to learn how to write intelligently and correctly.
Lesson #1: the difference between their, there, and they’re.
Their: refers to something that belongs to a person
ex: That is THEIR home.
They’re: the conjugation of the words “they” and “are”.
ex: THEY’RE coming to get us.
There: refers to a place
ex: I went THERE last summer.
Every single time you meant to write “they’re” you wrote “their” instead.
In my opinion, your inability to write properly makes you lose all credibility.
I have read widely about space exploration,particularly the moon landings.however,I have never been convinced by the authenticity of the photos.in this materialistic world,no nation can under take such a perilous venture like moon landing.it only takes an extra ordinarily united,daring,self less and technology savvy people like the ancient Egyptians, to accomplish such a feat. perhaps we should take one step back into history to make that giant stride for humanity.it is long over due.
“no nation can under take such a perilous venture like moon landing.it only takes an extra ordinarily united,daring,self less and technology savvy people like the ancient Egyptians, to accomplish such a feat.”
Sorry, that’s simply not true; a single individual (or small group) can do it. See what Burt Rutan has accomplished over the last few years, and couple that with the “materialistic” backing of Branson’s Virgin Galactic, the sky’s is no longer the limit.
One problem, Russia would have been watching the US launch intensely for any failure, and if it had happened they would have sounded the alarm to make the Americans look stupid.
So unless you seriously believe the Russians were in on the Hoax you cant possibly believe it was faked.
Maybe the reason we didn’t go back for so long is because space crafts that were there way before us told us not to go back. The first moon landing was real, its some recent ones are probably likely to be fake…and or it just took a while to work with those space crafts (aliens). Don’t be doubtful, the government looks out for themselves not all of us! Chem trails are proof of that as well.