“I would like to point out the Apollo 11 press conference. take a look at Neil Armstrong, he is very nervous and is very very thoughtful of the words he chooses.”
If you knew anything about Neil Armstrong you would understand that he is a very quiet and reserved person who does not enjoy public speaking. Being “shy” does not make him a liar.
“Then Buzz Aldrin has a stern “not gonna give you no answer”type face.”
The astronauts were mostly military test pilots who were used to dealing with machines and talking in precise technical terms with engineers. They were thrown into the public eye unexpectedly and some didn’t handle it very well. Again, this isn’t proof that they were lying.
“You don’t even have to be a professional to figure their body language.it is so noticeable of a guilty composure!”
I think you’re seeing things the way you want to see them. Sure, they don’t appear completely comfortable in front of the cameras, but that doesn’t mean they’re lying. Many people get nervous when they do public speaking, it’s not a sign that they are being untruthful.
“Supposedly they accomplished a great feat they should have been very happy, but this wasn’t the case.”
Yeah… just look at the grumpy looks on their faces in this picture:
http://www.allwrite.nl/i/apollo-11-crew.jpg
More Comments by LunarOrbit
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Photographic Evidence
My main concern is that if they really did land on the moon in 1969, then why was there not a single attempt to repeat the feat
Ummm… NASA landed men on the Moon five more times after Apollo 11.
Don’t we …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
For me it is that easy to say that the moon landings never happened.
Then you’re a gullible fool who hasn’t bothered to learn anything about Apollo.
And in a sense they never did because I wasn’t born yet when they occurred.
What …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
I did not verify any of the “facts” stated here
Maybe you should. You’d look less like a fool if you didn’t constantly cite unverified claims.
Even if most of the alleged US Moon rocks are real, the Russians were able to …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
That is why no one takes you HBs seriously. You can’t get your stories straight. We see HBs saying robotic probes put the laser reflectors on the Moon… and then other HBs who say the lasers were simply reflected off …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
You can reflect a laser off the moon’s surface.
No reflector required.
True, but a lot more of the laser’s light is reflected when a reflector is used. The reflectors reflect all light back in the direction it came from. Light reflected …
More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing? by LunarOrbit
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?
First of all, they DID do it again. Apollo 11 was not the only mission to the Moon… there were 6 landings (Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17), one aborted landing (Apollo 13), and two lunar orbiting missions …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?
There are two main reasons we haven’t gone back to the moon.
1. It’s REALLY expensive. The Apollo Program cost $25 billion (which would be around $170 billion in today’s dollars). Many people considered continuing to go to the moon after …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?
The rovers were folded up and mounted on the outside of the Lunar Module (LM).
You can see what I mean in the following picture…
http://bit.ly/eJ604x …