Water is *rare* on the Moon; in fact, it’s pretty limited to craters at the poles that are constantly in shadow. There are elements on Earth that are rare enough that if you aren’t sampling in the exact right place, you’d never know they were there.
The Apollo missions sampled a *tiny* portion of the lunar surface. All of the sites are on the near side, and most were chosen mostly for ease of landing than scientific interest. Notably, all got plenty of sunlight during a lunar “day”, so any water near the surface would have long since boiled off into space.
This is why missions like Clementine and LRO and LCROSS are so valuable; they provide a global overview of the Moon, and provide some context that was missing from the Apollo missions. They’re also a helluva lot cheaper than sending people.
There is plenty we still *don’t* know about the Moon.
More Comments by jfb
His name was Ed Fendell, a controller in Houston in charge the remotely-controlled camera on the LRV.
Yes, he had to take the signal delay into account – he had to anticipate the liftoff and rate of ascent. …
It doesn’t have to be pretty to work.
The foil acted as a thermal blanket, reflecting as much of the sunlight as possible to keep the base of the LM from overheating. The foil was only about 125 microns thick, …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Scientific Evidence
The blueprints *weren’t* destroyed; they’re on file at the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, AL. Not that it matters; we couldn’t build the Saturn V today if we wanted to, because most of the technology it used is …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – More Photographic Proof
Did you know that many of the people involved in the moon landing died from a car crash?
Upwards of 90 people die *every day* in car crashes in the US; it’s not at all surprising that a lot people “involved …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Camera Problems
It’s not a C, it’s an O.
And it *looks* like some kind of inclusion (a pebble embedded in a slightly softer matrix rock). It looks like the surrounding matrix has eroded a bit, leaving a small channel around the …
More Comments on Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing? by jfb
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?
I think I’ve answered this exact question several times already.
In a nutshell:
1. It’s expensive. Apollo wound up costing over US $170 bn in 2005 dollars, which is a lot for any single program. We weren’t …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?
The third reason is that it’s still really *hard*. It’s not trivial to engineer manned spacecraft and man-rated launchers, even with the last 40 years of experience, and getting out of Earth’s gravity well is no easier now than …
Apollo Moon Landing Hoax – Why Fake a Moon Landing?
@Ozzy Moron:
Sorry, no, that’s not how it works. NASA has made its claim (we sent people to the Moon), and has backed it up with physical evidence (samples, science data from instruments left on the Moon), documentary evidence (film, …