In 1959 Bill Kaysing predicted that at that time, the chances of getting a man to the moon and back alive were 0.0014%, taking into […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
The laser ranging argument is rubbish i.e. you could “laser range” the moon without mirrors. Or perhaps you could use a Russian mirror already there.
This subject is like an enforced religion from medieval times – “Believe or ye shall perish” As most people prefer to live than die it is not necessarily in their interest to divulge any secrets. Look at the rocketdyne guy – How many times did the CIA try to kill him (was it 5? ) There is most certainly something not quite right about all of this.
The thing that bothers me about the hoax theories is that the best “anomalies” stem from gross ignorance.
The crosshair’s bit is one of the worst. What would that actually explain? Are people implieing that they actually propped up a giant crosshair behind objects?
That we should see stars with that sort of exposure time? Have you ever, ever tried to photograph stars? I don’t think so.
The absolute worst is “How could we go to the moon with a computer with so little power on board?” That’s a statement that comes from someone who isn’t a programmer. (Maybe a Java programmer?) Computers were used very, very extensively in the program, but most of them on the ground. The workload onboard was small beans for even the crudest of computers.
The shadows are on uneven surface. Light reflects off ground and objects. Dust moves in parabolic arcs. Flags wave when you move them. etc. The Van Allen belt exposure they got was equal to a chest x-ray. etc.
I’ll tell you what’s not right about it; how come the Soviets never tried to hoax it? If you think the Soviets would have any qualms about lieing about it, you don’t know enough about the Soviets. The soviets had enough control over their media and people that they’d have a far easier time pulling it off than the US.
But even they didn’t try that one.
Plus, while the soviets have a nice list of firsts, so does the US – including things that were far more relevant to the actual execution of the moon landing, such as extravehicular activity. And they were usually behind the Soviet’s firsts by mere weeks.
Even hinting the Americans could’ve actually accomplished such a hoax is pissing on Russia’s intelligence agency.
The rocks probably do “look” like ones in your backyard, but that’s because your not a geologist. There are moon origin meteorites, but not without signs of atmospheric entry or local contamination.
How come NASA isn’t trying to prove the hoax theory wrong? It’s simple:
*All* of the complaints have been thoroughly refuted over and over and over again, and anything else they could ~possibly~ offer is just as fallible.
Going back? If they could hoax it before they can do it now.
Satellite photo? Computer graphics. Something they DIDN’T have in 1969.
How come so many government conspiracies involve much, much smaller numbers of people get blown out of the water? The fact that people can name so many famous government conspiracies that got away is more telling. The moon hoax would be 10,000 times harder to fake than blowing something up and pointing fingers.
I don’t just think we never landed on the moon, I believe that it is impossible to complete this mission today. Just the fuel required to make the trip, the massive shielding required to protect not just the astronauts and the LM as well as the tremendous stress that would occur to the craft in flight make the project look phony. Take a good look at the photos of the LM. If you say that it would be possible for this craft to travel at thousands of miles per hour, you are a fool. With loose panels, aluminum foil, and what looks like tent material; there is no way that thing successfully landed (6 times) on the moon- no way- I’m not buying it. Look at the ridiculous antenna setup on the top of the LM, the metal looks about as thick as a coat hanger. What about the fuel cell on the LM, where is it? There is no way you will ever convince me that there was enough space for a the fuel required to not only land on the moon, but to ascend as well.
I have a challenge for anyone who is willing to attempt it; build a replica or even a model and show us just the engine or booster. I guarantee that it is impossible to fit a 10,000 lb. per sq. ft. thruster into a compartment the size of the LM; let alone 3 men, a lunar rover, and the fuel cell to boot.
The Truth is it is a Hoax. No-one has landed on the moon. The conspiracy theory is that they did land. NASA was just an instrument used to drum the idea that this “so called” landing occurred when it didnt. Reason=Cold WAR against USSR (Russia). Using your logic while checking out images tells you its FAKE.
Now just because i believe that it was a HOAX does not make me a NERD as NASA agents and affiliates would like others to believe. I also believe 911 was an inside job. And that the war on terror is a load of crap. Fox News would try to do what NASA and their affilates do as well.
Ive worked very hard in my life, im not 40, Joe. Im 28. I have a Girl Friend and she is a beautiful Angel. Ive also just finished recording my 5th Album.
You (Joe and Friends) probably work for NASA. You never know. But one thing i do know is that the Moon Landing is a HOAX.
OK… first off everyone can agree that nikola tesla is by far one of the smartest men ever.. why did we never get to hear his dynamic theory of gravity… well.. because it disproved newton and einstein.. einsteins tests were only conducted based on newtons observations as a frame of reference.. so.. if newton was wrong.. yep.. einstein was too… all energy is vibrations.. our earth spins because the sunlight hits it and causes tides in the oceans, soil, atmosphere….everything.. and then when we have a full moon the suns rays (visible and invisible) are reflected onto the portion of the earth thats normally cooling… ok.. well that basically puts a brake on the earths rotation and inertia drives large bodies of water forward.. causing high and low tides.. it has nothing to do with the moons gravity.. if you believe in gravity you have to believe in a strong and a weak force.. and nothing can be that selective and segregate WHAT it is going to pull….especially if you say a large body in space has gravity simply because it has mass then why are meteors striking the surface of the moon and not being pulled towards us… and that also proves that the moon has NO atmosphere.. and gravity is relative to atmosphere.. if you dont have light you cant heat up water and other gases and the planet wont start to spin… if you lack an iron core (also like the moon) you will not generate energy… A VERY FRIKKIN HIGH AMOUNT… that energy traps in all the earths gases…. the moon lacks all of that…. simply from pushing the flag into the moon he would have pushed himself into space… LONG LIVE TESLA AND THE FORWARD MOVING UNIVERSE…..
I am surprised to see how many so called smart people believe the moon landings were faked. First and fore most I am not an U.S. Citizen and I think that you U.S. Citizens who believe the moon landings were faked are the more unfair with your country.
If you look any video sequence of Neil Armstrong and the U.S. flag you will see that efectifely the flag is NOT waving, I challenge any one to reproduce the ´waving´effect, you will not be able to do, so the landing in real
Hi, if it was a hoax can somebody explain how the sound and picture images of the moon landing came from the moon to earth via the radio telescope at Parkes NSW Australia, then relayed by land line to the Huston space centre. The time of day and lunar position meant that Huston was blind to the moon and all communication had to come and go through the radio telescope at Parkes.
Please, no claims “they were in on the hoax” or any other cop out. The signals came from the moon.
Wow. I stumbled on this site through a google search and I must say that I am STUNNED by the sheer ignorance and lack of any authoritative knowledge posessed by those who claim this hoax. I was tempted to just pass this dungeon of ignorance by, and will do so, never to return, but not before saying:
As you conveniently put aside all of the physical artifacts, all of the toil of thousands of people (myself included) to build and operate the program; all of the environmental effects/evidence still present and visible on this earth, in its orbit, and on the surface of the moon; all of the life work and bravery of hundreds who have experienced near-space flight and space travel; all of the actual devices developed and still being used today; and all of the personal experiences of those who know and do; As you put aside and cling to your own half-truthes, distortions, and hearsays, and ask us to prove the negative – ask yourself this: WHAT IF YOU ARE WRONG ABOUT YOUR CONSPIRACY THEORY? WHAT DOES THAT MAKE YOU? To start, it makes you an ignorant, pompous, silly fool. Buzz Aldrin reacted to one of you by punching him in the face, which was understandable. I prefer to just let you wallow in your ignorance.
One point that nobody seems to discuss to is the 3 astronauts who made this mission. on balance, I believe they did go but equally acknowledge that each of them suffered afterwards and became partialrecluses. Guilty conscience according to sceptics or equally, naive experts who became too overwhelmed by it all? I recently met Armstrong who speaks quite convincingly about this experience at the age of 77. He does not appear delusional or to lack integrity. I believe that he believes he went, even if others dont.