In 1959 Bill Kaysing predicted that at that time, the chances of getting a man to the moon and back alive were 0.0014%, taking into […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
In 1959 Bill Kaysing predicted that at that time, the chances of getting a man to the moon and back alive were 0.0014%, taking into […]
Continue Reading Apollo Moon Landing Hoax
this hoax thing can be settled easy,i hope bart sibrel reads this,for the last while theres been detailed pictures from the surface of the moon from JAXA/NHK,also cappable of collecting moon samples,i know what you think im gonna ask,no forget about finding lunor landings,when u have the DNA of a hoax,compareJAXAs moon samples to samples taken from apollo 11and beleave me NASAs gonna be looking at this very carefully,no match,CASE CLOSED,if we went to the moon in 69,by now they whould have space stations built there,and the rich could get return trips there and back,only machines can pass the van allen belt not flesh and bone
APOLLO 11 moon samples=new moon samples from JAXA/NHK….DNA proof no match ,,i whould bet my life on it
guess my DNA theary is dead,now that i learned the NASA will send a sponsored intrument called the MOON MINERALOGY MAPPER will ride along side JAXA,and will use a infrared spectrome to survey the lunar terrain,,,,,,,HMMMMMMM why do they need to ride along …….TO COVER THERE TRACKS
ok i got a way to figure it out ,and theres nothing NASA can do to cover up this 1, next ship they send to the moon ,have a device that measures the radiation threw the van allen belts,if its at a level were no living thing can pass threw it,CASE CLOSED,and theres nothing NASA can do about it
The radiation levels in the Van Allen belts has been measured many times with many different methods and devices, the information is freely available.
I also was of the opinion that the lunar landings were faked and that man never went to the moon. The number of problems and inconsistencies is quite staggering as well as the number of “accidents” involving astronauts in the earlier part of the Apollo space program. Well, now an even uglier conspiracy faces me in that I believe that the lunar missions were real but the truth of what technology was used and for what purpose a mission to the moon was chosen. There were 6 manned missions with lunar landings to the moon in a period of 3 years (Jul’69 – Dec’72). Thereafter no missions were ever undertaken. Why would NASA create doubt that they ever went to the moon by purposely distorting and fabricating some of the lunar evidence to muddle the waters?
My reasons for believing the moon landings took place. I believe there is a fountain of knowledge regarding electrogravitics, and “free energy” and other science that have been deliberately suppressed for decades at least. No conventional technology would have been able to keep human beings safe from the Van Allen belt radiation; so only 2 options exists to explain the lunar missions. (1) They were faked (2) NASA utilized technology like electrogravitics. As I said, if they have deliberately faked evidence to cast doubt on the authenticity of the lunar landings then reality is even more twisted than them actually faking the lunar landings. Because then the question is why would they want to hide the real scope and depth of what happened/what were discovered on the moon? I am not even excluding that only one mission could have taken place and that the rest or some were faked. Also the Apollo program cost *1*$20,443,600,000. I think we urgently need to get to the moon and find out what really is going on, this need no be an international effort though…
*1* http://www.fi.edu/pieces/schutte/landchart.html
View Comment
The russians were years ahead of us in the space race. They were already developing a craft to take a single man to the moon. If you look at their design, it was much more credible, but they still couldn’t get the mass of the craft small enough to fly a single man and equipment to the moon. This was to be done with two launches, one for the manned module that would go to the moon and return. The other for the additional fuel and equipment that would be necessary for the trip. They weren’t taking a lunar rover, or enough food, water, and air to sustain 3 astronauts. Yet they had to face the reality that using their current technology the trip was impossible. They spent 14 years trying to achive this goal before canceling the program. Their aerospace technology at the start of the program was just ahead of the U.S. technology, and after 14 years it was far beyond the point where the U.S. finished its first manned lunar craft and put it on the moon. Yet the Russians after 14 years realized that it could not be physically done. That is something that with todays current nanotechnology and microcomputers we are able to consider doing, but even with that, the projection for a manned lunar round trip isn’t for 15 more years.
The reason that the remainder of the U.S. missions were scrubbed and the program cancelled was because it was taking a huge ammount of resources to pull off a fake lunar walk and technology was getting to the point where people were starting to question the validity of the photos and video.
View Comment
Baratacus said, as the earth passes between the moon and the sun, it creates the lunar cycle.. (half, full, crescent, etc..)
That is wrong. This is refering to a lunar eclipse. The only time the Earth shadow comes to play on the cycles of the moon is during a lunar eclipse.
Othewise the cycles of the moon are merely the aspect angle of the sun shining on the moon as we see it from the earth. Fact.
No one has suggested that we didn’t send our astronauts into space. The launch happened as witnessed by thousands. So did the splash downs. As witnessed by hundreds. The suggestion was that we never left the earth’s orbit passing through and outside of the protection of the Van Allen radiation belts.
View Comment
sorry mikeometer, I wasn’t very clear about that. As the earth passes directly between the moon and the sun we see a full moon, as the moon passes between the sun and the earth we see a new moon (no moon) since the dark side is facing us. I didn’t mean to imply that the phases of the moon were caused by the shadow of the earth on the lunar surface, but it does sound like that’s what I’m saying though.
Instead of saying, ” as the earth passes between the moon and the sun, it creates the lunar cycle..”
I should have said, “as the earth passes from between the moon and the sun to behind the moon, our view of the illuminated area of the moon changes causing the lunar cycle.
Thanks for the clarification
View Comment
Put aside the notion that the Moon landings were deception. Work on the idea that the Moon photographs were faked. Then research “2001: A Space Odyssey”. Stanley Kulbrick finishing filming in UK shortly before the Moon landings. And he got to use that special NASA lens for filming “Barry Lyndon”. Then say to yourself: “My government wouldn’t do anything that deceitful.” Hard to keep a straight face, right? US governments have a history of criminality, and they have become bolder over the years. Just needs one crack in the dam.