I also was of the opinion that the lunar landings were faked and that man never went to the moon. The number of problems and inconsistencies is quite staggering as well as the number of “accidents” involving astronauts in the earlier part of the Apollo space program. Well, now an even uglier conspiracy faces me in that I believe that the lunar missions were real but the truth of what technology was used and for what purpose a mission to the moon was chosen. There were 6 manned missions with lunar landings to the moon in a period of 3 years (Jul’69 – Dec’72). Thereafter no missions were ever undertaken. Why would NASA create doubt that they ever went to the moon by purposely distorting and fabricating some of the lunar evidence to muddle the waters?
My reasons for believing the moon landings took place. I believe there is a fountain of knowledge regarding electrogravitics, and “free energy” and other science that have been deliberately suppressed for decades at least. No conventional technology would have been able to keep human beings safe from the Van Allen belt radiation; so only 2 options exists to explain the lunar missions. (1) They were faked (2) NASA utilized technology like electrogravitics. As I said, if they have deliberately faked evidence to cast doubt on the authenticity of the lunar landings then reality is even more twisted than them actually faking the lunar landings. Because then the question is why would they want to hide the real scope and depth of what happened/what were discovered on the moon? I am not even excluding that only one mission could have taken place and that the rest or some were faked. Also the Apollo program cost *1*$20,443,600,000. I think we urgently need to get to the moon and find out what really is going on, this need no be an international effort though…
*1* http://www.fi.edu/pieces/schutte/landchart.html