speaking of all these rocks you guys say is proof — there is still one thing that bothers me: it is said (right on the Hasselblad website among many other places) that the 12 cameras the apollo astronauts took to the moon were left on the moon in order to help lessen the weight upon takeoff. however, there was no concern for the hundreds of pounds of rocks these guys brought back. and how exactly did this go down anyhow: the astronauts went inside the lunar module, took off there space suits, took the film from the camera, had to get suited back up in order to exit the LM and dump the camera. seems like an awful lot of work just to save what, 4 or 5 pounds of weight at most. and also, notice Hasselblad says 12 cameras are still on the moons surface — that’s one for each lunar-walking astronaut. yet, in one of neil armstrongs few interviews (you can google search neil armstrong brinkley interview transcripts and find it for proof) he states that buzz actually had to ask him for his camera so he could take some pictures as well. this obviously means that there was only 1 camera on the first mission, so where is this 12th camera hasselblad, the moon landing camera manufacturer, is talking about.
see, things just dont add up with how they said the moon landings went down.
there’s a lot of little descrepancies that hoax believers would like answered. all the dubunking you guys do is a matter of opinion just like our conspiracy theories are just a matter of opinion — the truth be told, none of us has ever gone to the moon, so we don’t know for a fact if stars can be seen, or how shadows should go, or if a flag would continue to wave after its pole has been tampered with, or if footprints could be left, etc etc. everything for both sides are theories and thats that. but, one of my biggest reasons for not believing is this: common sense to me seems to say that the moon is just too far away to get to with the technology they had back then, and too far and risky to send men there – without knowing what they were going to encounter or the environment they were heading into – before they would send some type of animal as a test subject first. they didnt have time though; afterall they were in a space race. and hasnt nasa before and since lived by the rule that man doesnt go where a monkey hasnt been first. why didnt they follow this rule with apollo.